What's new

Possible cheating in the ESL Pathtopro final

Pig Of The Hut

Day 0 Phenomenal Dr. Fate and Darkseid player
I am from Russia and everything you say about Kingusha is absolutely true. I don't think any sensible person will vouch for that shit. Especially when bambooka is taking Inspectachoz's place in eleague, he is an amazing Atro player from my area, who can't get a visa.

And I remember pig talking that Russian players are irresponsible for not getting a visa in time, that isn't always true. The problem is getting an American visa for Russians in general these days. And you can't blame a player for the situation in international relationship between two governments. Most of the good players in Russia don't have much spare money, and just applying for visa costs a lot for them.
This cheating situation is a mess, but you can't blame all Russian players for the crap that a couple of cheaters did. Sure we are fucked because we were born in the wrong country))) you guys are so lucky !
Great solution to the visa problem would probably only let those who already have a visa to participate in online qualifiers. And right now situation isn't much different. Even if a visaless dude wins, his place still goes to the next person in line who has visa. But why even bother ?! I mean sure ban Russia, why would you want your community to grow on the international level.
I like your suggestion. Proof of visa required
 

just_2swift

MK1 is the best MK period.
I open this thread to talk you about the weird situation that took place during the ESL PathToPro Final, online tournament played on August 19th with 12k prize pool and 2 E-League spots for the top placers.
This tournament wasn't open to everyone, only the 12 players who won one weekly PTP event (or took 2nd place, if the weekly winner was banned from the PTP final due to surpassing the 45 IPS point limit) were allowed to play. Here is the bracket: https://play.eslgaming.com/injustice/europe/ij2-ps4/major/path-to-pro-europe/finals/rankings/

I have many reasons to believe that the player named Bambooka, who took 4th place, let another player play the tournament matches in his place. That player ID is Kingusha.

The elements that lead me to this are the following:

1) Kingusha and Bambooka both live in Moscow and know each other, this is confirmed by other russian players. They are not far from each other, so Kingusha could easily play the games from Bambooka house.

2) Bambooka is a Superman - Aquaman player, and this can be verified by checking his Hero Card. Here are some pics of his profile taken on August 19th, that clearly shows who he mained up until that day:





He is a Superman-Aquaman main, and further proof of that is the fact that during MFA 2017, offline tournament in Moscow that took place some weeks before the PTP final, he only used them. You can see him playing here :


Now, during the Pathtopro finals he used Superman, Black Adam, Harley Quinn, Supergirl at a high level:

Supergirl :
Harley Quinn :
Black Adam :
Superman :

According to his profile he never used any of the above characters except for Superman. How is that possible? Do I really have to believe that he trains with them using another account and never uses them on Bambooka?
Also, all of the characters he showed, except Superman, lacked customization. This isn't proof of anything, but in my opinion is an ulterior element that leads to believe that he never used them. He customized Superman, who is his true main, but never touched the others...also his Adam was lv.1, while Supergirl and Harley lv.3, and Superman lv.20. Isn't that weird?
Let's take a look at the profile of his friend Kingusha, very good and known player who attended the 2015 Mortal Kombat Cup in Paris, with a screen taken on August 19th:


Up until that day he mained all (and only) the characters that have been used during the final + Aquaman. Is that a coincidence? What is the chance? No reasonable person can believe that. Also, even if I can't prove it, Kingusha was not online on PS4 for all the tournament duration.

3) Bambooka is not a great player. I don't want this to sound as an insult, but he just isn't. His level isn't very high and this is also known by all the russian and EU community. The player who was playing during the pathtopro had a much higher level than his: a level which is compatible with Kingusha, who is very good.

Also, every player has his own characteristic style and Kingusha isn't an exception. Me and other players have played hundreds of casuals against him, I know that he was the one playing...Everyone who has played against him can realize that. Of course this can't be proven, but a competitive player knows that, and can feel that.
If you see 2 Doctor Fate playing, without their screen name, you can tell who of them is Dragon and who is OmgxBdon. If you see 2 Deadshot, you know who is Foxy and who is Sonic. Each player has his style.

Now, since I am one of the players who lost to Bambooka and had his tournament compromised because of him, I sent a detailed ticket to ESL. They investigated for one month, and I thank them very much for that, but despite their effort no decisive proof was found. Afterall, if one player plays an online tournament in the home of another one, finding any kind of 100% proof is probably impossible.
Yet my suspect remains, so I decided to share the story with the community and see what you guys think.

I personally hope that tournaments as big and important as the PathtoPro finals won't be played online ever again.
 

DeftMonk

Warrior
No, dude, right wroten is "sukablyad".
"Suka" - ur mother
"blyad" - is so wonderful woman.
I know russian lil bit, bicoz i work half-year with russian comapnies, they teach me, how to play injustice very well.
Russian community and players >>>>> pindosys community and players. Even Sonig Thoughs
homie who ever told you suka means your mother obviously thought your mom was a bitch. No offense meant... it just means what I said.
 

GLoRToR

Positive Poster!
@Asodimazze
You are my brother through thousands of matches grinded out together.
But let me play the devil's advocate and please listen to my reasoning before you discard it.



While it is true that offline is the best way to compete because cheating is minimised this way, I personally think it's a great thing that there are online tournaments because this way people who can't afford the time or money to travel still get to compete at a pretty high level.

However.
If you play online, there is no telling who is sitting in that other chair for the most part.
If you asked me to play a game I'm good at from your computer for half the money in an online tournament you entered, I damn well would.
All is fair in love and war.
This is a bit like calling the #lookatthatknee a "cheap move". It might be but it works.
Having a better player win your matches? So what. It's that player winning.

In the end this person, whoever it is, has beaten everyone else without actually cheating.
If it was someone else playing, so what.
 

EMPEROR_KNICKS

Master of Kombat(frauds)
@Asodimazze
You are my brother through thousands of matches grinded out together.
But let me play the devil's advocate and please listen to my reasoning before you discard it.



While it is true that offline is the best way to compete because cheating is minimised this way, I personally think it's a great thing that there are online tournaments because this way people who can't afford the time or money to travel still get to compete at a pretty high level.

However.
If you play online, there is no telling who is sitting in that other chair for the most part.
If you asked me to play a game I'm good at from your computer for half the money in an online tournament you entered, I damn well would.
All is fair in love and war.
This is a bit like calling the #lookatthatknee a "cheap move". It might be but it works.
Having a better player win your matches? So what. It's that player winning.

In the end this person, whoever it is, has beaten everyone else without actually cheating.
If it was someone else playing, so what.
I hope you dont actually believe this, because no its not fair to have someone else play for you so you can get money, and yes doing this makes you a bad person and overall harms the community. Might be cheap if its something like some random 100 dollars online tourney because well its only 100 bucks, even though you are still potentially robbing someone. But in P2P an online qualifying event where you have the potential to win thousands of dollars, then travel to the us to potentially win 100s of thousands of dollars is wrong. The person who qualifed isnt really a that good of player, and someone who didnt qualify beat players who did, robbing them of thousands of dollars, a chance to be on television, travel to the us, and win even more money. Thats not fair at all and imo if this really is true they should be banned,because basically this mediocore player colluded with someone and robbed people who should be going to the us and being in eleague.
 

Asodimazze

https://twitter.com/AlfioZacco
@Asodimazze
You are my brother through thousands of matches grinded out together.
But let me play the devil's advocate and please listen to my reasoning before you discard it.



While it is true that offline is the best way to compete because cheating is minimised this way, I personally think it's a great thing that there are online tournaments because this way people who can't afford the time or money to travel still get to compete at a pretty high level.

However.
If you play online, there is no telling who is sitting in that other chair for the most part.
If you asked me to play a game I'm good at from your computer for half the money in an online tournament you entered, I damn well would.
All is fair in love and war.
This is a bit like calling the #lookatthatknee a "cheap move". It might be but it works.
Having a better player win your matches? So what. It's that player winning.

In the end this person, whoever it is, has beaten everyone else without actually cheating.
If it was someone else playing, so what.
Glor I don't agree with you on this, doing something like the one you described would make me feel bad, it's just wrong and I'm 100% fair all the time. What you said makes me think that cheating in online environments is so easy that many players consider it almost "fair" lol.
Should I feel dumb for not cheating ESL myself in some other ways maybe? Perhaps I should have created 10 fake accounts and play the pathtopro even after I qualified, gatekeeping some good opponents. Or maybe I should have played under some of my friend accounts and let them join me in the final, I don't know :rolleyes:

ESL and other online tournament organizers need to step up their rules and find much more efficient ways to prevent this stuff; we are not talking about community cups with small prize pools anymore, online events keep getting bigger and bigger pots and is just dumb that cheaters can do this much damage and get away with no problems at all.

They didn't even cover the cheating well, we wouldn't be here talking about it if it was the case.
Also, the main problem about this one is that it doesn't end online at all: it will continue in E-LEAGUE in a couple weeks :/
 

Swindle

Philanthropist & Asshole
@Asodimazze
You are my brother through thousands of matches grinded out together.
But let me play the devil's advocate and please listen to my reasoning before you discard it.



While it is true that offline is the best way to compete because cheating is minimised this way, I personally think it's a great thing that there are online tournaments because this way people who can't afford the time or money to travel still get to compete at a pretty high level.

However.
If you play online, there is no telling who is sitting in that other chair for the most part.
If you asked me to play a game I'm good at from your computer for half the money in an online tournament you entered, I damn well would.
All is fair in love and war.
This is a bit like calling the #lookatthatknee a "cheap move". It might be but it works.
Having a better player win your matches? So what. It's that player winning.

In the end this person, whoever it is, has beaten everyone else without actually cheating.
If it was someone else playing, so what.
Idk, you're sounding pretty Russian here.
 

GLoRToR

Positive Poster!
Glor I don't agree with you on this
If it's common it's meta :D

Plus I'm not saying cheating is good.
I'm saying it's not cheating because someone's skill against another person's skill is fair fighting.
Saying you're someone else does not take from the value of the gameplay.
Identity has literally nothing to do with competing.
 

Asodimazze

https://twitter.com/AlfioZacco
If it's common it's meta :D

Plus I'm not saying cheating is good.
I'm saying it's not cheating because someone's skill against another person's skill is fair fighting.
Saying you're someone else does not take from the value of the gameplay.
Identity has literally nothing to do with competing.
I don't know how can you say something like that. If in a tournament I am supposed to play against player A, but he lets Sonicfox play in his place and I lose, both of them have to be banned and penalized...this shouldn't even be something to clarify really.
 

nugava

Apprentice
When this shit happens during online poker tournaments, the website investigates and if they conclude there's collusion, both people are punished. It happened many times.
 

pfiidud3

Apprentice
When this shit happens during online poker tournaments, the website investigates and if they conclude there's collusion, both people are punished. It happened many times.
I can see how you could tell in fighting games. How one would tell with online poker is beyond me.....
 

GLoRToR

Positive Poster!
I don't know how can you say something like that. If in a tournament I am supposed to play against player A, but he lets Sonicfox play in his place and I lose, both of them have to be banned and penalized...this shouldn't even be something to clarify really.
Fair enough, identity of top players does matter in the sense that they are indeed the best players.
But your reasoning won't stand because a top player like SF would not stand in for a noname nobody to win a game for him, even less if he'd be found out.
We're talking about an online tournament with average joe players like myself or that russian kid.
And in that context, identity is really less relevant.

Again I'm not justifying cheating or bad behaviour, I'm saying it's all the same which baddie you wreck at the end of the day. And if that player would get his name high enough on the world rankings to be invited to compete in a real offline event, he'd soon be found out.
 

nugava

Apprentice
I can see how you could tell in fighting games. How one would tell with online poker is beyond me.....
Pretty much the same... Let say you are a somewhat decent poker player. You are playing the 250 dollars tourney on your favorite pokersite. There's 12000 players... With a lot of luck, patience and a tiny bit of skills, you manage to be one of the last 40 players... If you're out in 40th place, you win 2500 dollars... Whatever... If you make top 3, you hit the big payday... 150 000 dollars...
Let say you're friend with a professional poker player, you call him, he sits in front of your computer and play the perfect game, no mistake...
Then the website see the difference of "playstyle", investigates, and can ban you for years. It happened a bunch.
 

pfiidud3

Apprentice
Pretty much the same... Let say you are a somewhat decent poker player. You are playing the 250 dollars tourney on your favorite pokersite. There's 12000 players... With a lot of luck, patience and a tiny bit of skills, you manage to be one of the last 40 players... If you're out in 40th place, you win 2500 dollars... Whatever... If you make top 3, you hit the big payday... 150 000 dollars...
Let say you're friend with a professional poker player, you call him, he sits in front of your computer and play the perfect game, no mistake...
Then the website see the difference of "playstyle", investigates, and can ban you for years. It happened a bunch.
I just never gave poker that much credit as a 'game of skill'. Calling someone out for there betting practices seems arguable imo. But as i said, i dnt poker.
 

Nobus3r1

House of Bane; ID: 8V596
I just never gave poker that much credit as a 'game of skill'. Calling someone out for there betting practices seems arguable imo. But as i said, i dnt poker.
If you have a large enough sample size monitoring someones behavior (or almost anything really) it can be, depending on the level of difference you're looking to detect, anywhere from trivially easy to basically impossible to detect a difference. In the case of online poker were the data set on your behavior is likely thousands if not hundreds of thousands of hands detecting a substantial change in behavior would fall into the 'trivially easy' category.
 

Asodimazze

https://twitter.com/AlfioZacco
So, today is the day.
Despite all the elements say this is an obvious case of cheating, Bambooka didn't get disqualified by ESL or E-League, no one did anything and today he is going to play in the Injustice 2 World Finals for a 250k $ pot on live television. It's probably the biggest E-Sport fraud of the year (maybe ever?)

Don't miss it!

 

M.D.

Spammer. Crouch walk hater.
It would be even funnier if he actually won the thing, too bad it's impossible.
 

QueenOmega

Apprentice
So, today is the day.
Despite all the elements say this is an obvious case of cheating, Bambooka didn't get disqualified by ESL or E-League, no one did anything and today he is going to play in the Injustice 2 World Finals for a 250k $ pot on live television. It's probably the biggest E-Sport fraud of the year (maybe ever?)

Don't miss it!
Ey, at least you can watch how he's destroyed by dragon.
When can I see it?
 

Asodimazze

https://twitter.com/AlfioZacco
So, he didn't even pretend he knows how to use the characters he picked in the pathtopro, went only Superman and lost fast.
E-LEAGUE commentators laugh and clearly say he is controversial, probably cheated, yet he is there and I'm home. Congrats ESL for not doing shit, congrats E-LEAGUE for letting him play. I'm fucking mad
 

Roy Arkon

I will leave my seal on you!
Even if it is indeed true, at least Bambooka didn't get too far in the tourney. He had a few good moments against both Dragon and Nubcakes but he did the same questionable decision of letting Nubcakes get extra damage via Clash not once, but twice (I guess he thought he would be able to get an opening and that one bar he had left will be enough) along with a few others and he lost 6-0 to both of them, 3-0 a piece.

Let's get one thing straight though: Online tournaments are essential, as not everyone can go to Majors in order to eventually get to such big events such as this. Yes there is the whole aspect of playing from home which increases the chances of cheating, but online is still essential and we can't disqualify these tournies all together because of this alone. All we can hope from now on is that ESL and E-League will take notes and make sure that there is 0 chances of something like this happening ever again, but we can't forget the advantages online tournies can give to all players who do wanna get their spot the legit way just because of 2 assholes, and defiantly not bashing an entire country just because of them.
 

CrimsonShadow

Administrator and Community Engineer
Administrator
So, he didn't even pretend he knows how to use the characters he picked in the pathtopro, went only Superman and lost fast.
E-LEAGUE commentators laugh and clearly say he is controversial, probably cheated, yet he is there and I'm home. Congrats ESL for not doing shit, congrats E-LEAGUE for letting him play. I'm fucking mad
ESL would be way out of line to do something unless there was inconvertible proof.

No matter how suspicious it looked, it would be highly inappropriate for a league to ban or DQ a player on rumor alone.