You're clearly a moron that can't understand the basic concept that if players at the highest level of competition are able to win by playing defensively, then you don't need more defensive options. I'm done wasting my time, just adding you to the ignore list.
That's how discussions go on around here? Wow dude throws around insults like its nothing because I disagree with him then ignores me for that same reason. And just because people win using defensive options doesn't mean changes don't need to happen. Maybe they're just better than their opponents.
Shhh.
wat. who?
You can't really equate a player having good defense with the game having strong defensive options.
I think Kano's an outlier, his back dash is really good.
If players are able to play defensively well in this game, that's a clear indication that those who are unable to, just need to level up. If these players (who are known for good defensive play) were struggling in this game, there would be a case for more defensive options to be implemented. That's not the case here.
Name a fighting game where the defensive options are close in number & use to the offensive ones
You are being a bit of an asshole really. No need to be so rude to the guy.
Yeah I was a dick to him. But look at what I initially posted, then what he responded with. Then when I explain my points, look what he responds with again. I have no patience with people who are incapable of having a debate. He proved he was unable to and so I stopped wasting my time.
This is total crap. He insulted and ignored me like a little child because I feel like despite people winning using defensive options they still need help because there is no sembelence of balance between the 2. Anyone with a brain can see this. Its such a dumbed down argument to say "so and so won doing this so its finnneeeeeeeee". And I think you're more of the one who is unable to have a debate considering how easily you started throwing insults around and ignoring people who disagree with you.
@ TYM, you need to able to examine and expose terrible posts such as this one.
Go look at protagonist's thread on DJT and educate yourself
Says the fool who refuses to play Tanya until the teleport is "normalized". LOL.
I do not need to. I have fought DJT before. I am well-aware that he is one of the best fighting game players in this community.
Street Fighter.
You clearly do, as you have made it abundantly clear that you are ignorant of the point at hand
Which one? Cuz it for damn sure aint the majority & the one that was defensive mechanic heavy in SFIV people couldn't stand how many their were & how good they were to the point people are extremely happy they're gone in SFV.
It's a mix of reactions to SF5. Some people are quite sad to see the defensive options nerfed.
Sneaky, don't get baited into this. As the Salt Warden you're literally THE prize for trolls if you get salty. Anywho, defensive is fine - if Dave or anybody else can give legit reasons for defensive options to get buffed that isn't crying "rushdown is better than defense therefore we need buffs" then I'll listen, but they can't. Dave said why can't defense options get buffed, my answer is why can't offensive options get buffed? Since we're wanting to buff things that don't need it, I can't see a reason not to. Once again, everyone should watch Doctor Stabs vs Michelangelo at ECT pools - he'll show you the defense that everyone craves. People need to level up their defense game before asking for unnecessary defense buffs. This argument soo ridiculous. Why don't NRS just go back to MK9 and give ol' Smoke a low starter? Jesus man....
