Most chill, probably Mileena. Before their buffs, they never complained at all about her.
I think the point was that people should be discussing matchups right now, not matchup *numbers*.Can we stop pretending that it's still week 1? The game's been out for 2 months now, that's enough time to give a MU a decent number.
People are so scared of getting blown-up that there's barely any actual MU discussion going on in the forums.
Fuck, I didn't know you were the sultan of swag. I would have made a dire straits reference.Honoured to make it on this list. Hopefully the attention gets us some buffs
Did I say I know hard numbers for every MU? I said 2 months is enough time to give a MU a decent number.I think the point was that people should be discussing matchups right now, not matchup *numbers*.
If you honestly believe that you know a hard number for every single matchup your character has in the game, inclusive of variations, you are barking up the wrong tree. No one wants to see another 15 pages of "It's 6-4! No, it's 7-3!!!" right now, and it's way too early for that kind of silliness.
PimPimJim seems to have started a fine thread about current tier placement. People can definitely have a discussion about matchups. If they feel they can't then that's on them. Take the initiative and start it yourself. (That last part isn't for you necessarily but for anyone that want's matchup discussion to happen for their character.)Did I say I know hard numbers for every MU? I said 2 months is enough time to give a MU a decent number.
My point is that people are so scared of getting blown up for even saying, "guys, I think Raiden might be a bad MU", that MU discussions scarce. At this point in Injustice there were around 150 replies to the MU threads while in MKX there're around 50 replies (some forums don't even have a MU thread).
Considering MKX is even more popular than Injustice and that there are more users on TYM now, you don't have to have 20/20 vision to see that something's off.
I think you missed what I was saying -- the point was about matchup *numbers*, not matchup discussion.Did I say I know hard numbers for every MU? I said 2 months is enough time to give a MU a decent number.
My point is that people are so scared of getting blown up for even saying, "guys, I think Raiden might be a bad MU", that MU discussions scarce. At this point in Injustice there were around 150 replies to the MU threads while in MKX there're around 50 replies (some forums don't even have a MU thread).
Considering MKX is even more popular than Injustice and that there are more users on TYM now, you don't have to have 20/20 vision to see that something's off.
Kitana for the saltiest and Takeda for chill?Fun side question: saltiest character fan base and most chill?
For clarity's sake, your points are that people should be discussing MUs not numbers right now because they're unproductive, and that nobody knows every MU number yet, right? Well I agree with the latter.I think you missed what I was saying -- the point was about matchup *numbers*, not matchup discussion.
If you go back and read the IGAU discussions, a lot of the early stuff is absolute nonsense, with page after page of people aruing over whether this character is A tier or B tier, fighting over whether some MU is 6-4, 7-3, 5.5-4.5 etc when no one knew enough to authoritatively make those claims. It was an unproductive mess and I'm glad we're not doing that again.
Discussion of MU tools and difficulties is fine, but people claiming they're the authority on all matchup numbers 2 months into a game's life is silly.
I think you guys are saying the same thing, just slightly different semantics.For clarity's sake, your points are that people should be discussing MUs not numbers right now because they're unproductive, and that nobody knows every MU number yet, right? Well I agree with the latter.
However, I went back and looked at the early Injustice MU threads & compared to MKX's they seem far more helpful. Even the infamous Nightwing community's MU thread was extremely productive.
My initial points were never that someone knows every MU number, or that everyone should be spitting out random numbers, they were that 2 months is enough time to give a decent number (not finalized) for a single MU, and that there is barely any MU discussion going on in the forums. Do you disagree?
Fixed.If you go back and read the IGAU discussions, a lot of the stuff is absolute nonsense
Nailed it. I dropped Reptile for Mileena a week or so before the "Bottom 5" blow up. It's day and night. The Mileena community is ultra chill. The Rep forum was fucking Thunderdome.I personally think, most salty is probably the Reptile community. The "Reptile bottom 5" thread speaks for itself.
Most chill, probably Mileena. Before their buffs, they never complained at all about her.
Nailed it. I dropped Reptile for Mileena a week or so before the "Bottom 5" blow up. It's day and night. The Mileena community is ultra chill. The Rep forum was fucking Thunderdome.
Don't nobody do none complains over up in at the Scorpion board.I personally think, most salty is probably the Reptile community. The "Reptile bottom 5" thread speaks for itself.
Most chill, probably Mileena. Before their buffs, they never complained at all about her.
(Eddy Wang pls)Actually, there were exactly two threads proposing buffs and both TCs got eaten alive.