Menu
By:
Filters
What's new

MK + Injustice Uber XBL Match Making Thread [WORLDWIDE]

E

Eldriken

Guest
LtLuthor said:
Wait, you think W/L record determines skill?
Click to expand...
While it doesn't necessarily determine one's skill, it at least gives you somewhat of an idea as to whether or not they're worth a damn.

I'd rather fight someone who's 400/100 than someone who's 4294/3829.
 
Tony at Home

Tony at Home

Master
Eldriken said:
While it doesn't necessarily determine one's skill, it at least gives you somewhat of an idea as to whether or not they're worth a damn.

I'd rather fight someone who's 400/100 than someone who's 4294/3829.
Click to expand...
W/L means less than nothing so long as you can just use TrueSkill instead.

In Ranked I have waaaaay more wins than losses.

But in Player matches I have much more losses than wins.

The reason is Im more willing to rematch people who beat me than most people I play, given they usually leave after they lose a couple times. So in Player matches where I can rematch, I naturally lose more.

Even though I have a better record in Ranked, my TrueSkill is higher in Player matches because it takes into account most my loses are repeats against very strong players.

Obviously, you should be using TrueSkill, as its a better measure and cant be as easily manipulated as W/L ratio.
 
Hruza Da Bruza

Hruza Da Bruza

Must Mash Harder!!!!!
Add me on XBL, I love to play new people :)
GT: Hruza Da Bruza
I play NW, but I also have a shitty Grundy, and Cyborg, plus an even shittier Frost and MMH. Hahaha
 
ReD WolF

ReD WolF

Lord of the Drip
Feel free to add me
GT: i ReD WolF i
I main Batman/Grundy and am in the process of learning Bane, I'd love to get some sets in.
 
Dirtylova

Dirtylova

YOLO FLYING GRAYSON BICH
Eldriken said:
While it doesn't necessarily determine one's skill, it at least gives you somewhat of an idea as to whether or not they're worth a damn.

I'd rather fight someone who's 400/100 than someone who's 4294/3829.
Click to expand...

Umm. thats a difference of 300 and 465. Plus the 400/100 record is fairly new, thus making you a noob hunter.. keepo
 
E

Eldriken

Guest
Dirtylova said:
Umm. thats a difference of 300 and 465. Plus the 400/100 record is fairly new, thus making you a noob hunter.. keepo
Click to expand...
How does it make me a "noob hunter"? Obviously the person who has a 4:1 ratio is doing better than the person who barely has a 1:1 ratio. If they're "fairly new" and keeping that kind of a record, it would seem they know more of what they're doing than the person who loses almost as often as they win.

You can ask anyone here that's played me, I am by no means a "noob hunter" or anything close to that.
 
Dirtylova

Dirtylova

YOLO FLYING GRAYSON BICH
Eldriken said:
How does it make me a "noob hunter"? Obviously the person who has a 4:1 ratio is doing better than the person who barely has a 1:1 ratio. If they're "fairly new" and keeping that kind of a record, it would seem they know more of what they're doing than the person who loses almost as often as they win.

You can ask anyone here that's played me, I am by no means a "noob hunter" or anything close to that.
Click to expand...
Maybe I should've put a smiley face to indicate i was keeeding... Your jimmies need camo and kevlar material. Did not mean to russle
 
E

Eldriken

Guest
Dirtylova said:
Maybe I should've put a smiley face to indicate i was keeeding... Your jimmies need camo and kevlar material. Did not mean to russle
Click to expand...
I'm not even remotely bothered by it. There was just no indication that you were joking, is all. *shrug*
 
E

Eldriken

Guest
NRF_xFriction said:
eh… randoms are better on PSN, TYM members are better on XBL. just my observation so far.
Click to expand...
The only random on PSN I've come across that has given me an absolutely hard time is Shinra Bahamut. I believe that's his name, anyway. Pretty much everyone else is free to Doomsday and Batgirl.

I've only lost roughly 40 games out of the 600~ or so I've played on PSN. I know 640~ games isn't a lot to gauge by, but still.
 
lm Tweakk

lm Tweakk

#BuffAntiAirs
Eldriken said:
How does it make me a "noob hunter"? Obviously the person who has a 4:1 ratio is doing better than the person who barely has a 1:1 ratio. If they're "fairly new" and keeping that kind of a record, it would seem they know more of what they're doing than the person who loses almost as often as they win.

You can ask anyone here that's played me, I am by no means a "noob hunter" or anything close to that.
Click to expand...
I don't look at records , I only pay attention to true skill rank because that's something you can't boost for :p
 
E

Eldriken

Guest
lm Tweakk said:
I don't look at records , I only pay attention to true skill rank because that's something you can't boost for :p
Click to expand...
I generally do the same for XBL. But on PSN, they have a points system, so I look at their record more than their points.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.