Well a big difference between the dispute with the OG actors was that according to interviews with Daniel Pesina, apparently they felt that they helped truly
create those characters; helping with the costumes, coming up with the characters' iconic special moves, choreography and generally forming the basis of a number of design concepts that helped bring them to life far better than the rough character archetypes that they were given when development began. For Pesina, he felt there's every bit as much of himself in the performances of Scorpion and Johnny Cage for example, as there is of John Tobias's concept art. So for those actors, it had far more to do with wanting to be truly recognised as part of the original MK design team (as much as the technological developers behind the scenes), rather than it purely being down to their digitised likenesses continuing to be reused.
Indeed their dispute sounds closer to Lawrence Kasanoff of Threshold Entertainment's own lawsuit against Midway, where he too felt he himself had truly "created" many these characters beyond their simple archetypes in the games. Obviously he was going over the top in his case, since Threshold's first MK productions didn't emerge until 1995 with the first movie and the Journey Begins, when there was already 2 games, comics and novels out that already expanded the characters and lore, with the third game on the way. By the time Threshold released Conquest in 1998, arguably their most lore-heavy installment in the franchise, there had already been even more games and extended media that truly developed those characters he's referring to. That said, to give the crazy old guy some credit, his company
did create and develop some things that are still staples of MK to this day; Johnny and Sonya being a couple, Liu and Kitana as a couple, having to win 10 tournaments, the Lin Kuei logo in Conquest, Reptile's home realm of Zaterra, the first appearance of Quan Chi (though he was admittedly on loan from Midway as a publicity effort), Johnny learning from Master Boyd etc. However, he certainly wasn't the intellectual property owner to the game characters he attempted to sue for, but I'm digressing... you can read all about that how nutty Kasanoff got with his lawsuit here:
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/mortal-kombat-film-producer-sues-midway/1100-6212579/
Shahjehan Khan's almost rhetorical question here clearly appears to be more-so wondering about the big picture for the future of actors, I don't see it as specifically targeted against Mortal Kombat 1. After all, could this be what actors may end up having to do for a living all the time in the future, having no say on where their face is put, especially when they're not advertised for anything specific? This guy took work and ended up in Mortal Kombat, hurray, cool! But one day another person hoping for such a fun moment in the spotlight could sign a bunch of NDA's and end up in some kind of production that goes firmly against their ideological or political beliefs, or who knows, even extreme pornography. Could their reputation or career be damaged by "appearing" in something they had no idea what it would be simply because they had some bills to pay one day? Will the actor even be needed to actually play themselves anymore? As the uncanny valley gets smaller and smaller, could digital actors be the stars of whole television series yet the original actor will never see anything beyond the cost of being face-scanned? They're fair questions to ask the world, regardless of whether this guy enjoyed paid work to be put into an internationally acclaimed multimedia franchise involving ninjas and sorcerers or not. It's a subject matter the recent strikes targeted, so there's nothing wrong with him voicing his support on the matter.
When it comes to Mortal Kombat specifcally, I expect he'll be recast by the next game anyway, just like almost everyone has been for decades now and we'll never see his face again within the franchise. But as for now, I think he makes a good fresh take Quan Chi
www.instagram.com
