The first Turok was the only one I really liked also. However, this new Turok coming out looks very promising. I'm not getting my hopes up though, just in case.Tim Static said:The new weapons and the ideas for #2 were great, it just played like shit. lolMastaDev said:haha y didn't u like the 2nd one....all the awesome weapons....i didn't know they were making a new one..
Are you on XBL? There are a couple videos for the new Turok for 360 & PS3. It looks great and sounds great, but like all the Turoks after #1, I'm still nervous lol
Tim Static said:N64 > PSX a million times over. The PSX is the most overrated gameing system ever. They had more games, but 96% were garbage. Spice Girls the game? Hello?
Tim Static said:I'm def not wanting to start an arguement, but what makes you say that?MastaDev said:get off psx tim....it owned n64 by far...
Popularity dosnt mean quality....
I was workig at Best Buy as the Media Asst. Supervisor during the time of the release of the N64 & PSX., as well as the next couple years after that.
The PSX def had more titles to choose from, but seriously, how many of those games, against the number of games released were seriously classics? How many magazines and web sites did PSX games win awards and such for? Hardly any. I'm not toally anti-PSX, hell, I own a PS3 and a PSP which I use more than any of my other consoles, but there are not that many PSX games that have stood the stand of time like alot of the better N64 titles, like Mario 64 & Zelda OoT. The N64 did have alot fewer games, mostly due to the higher cost to produce cartridges, and overall, the N64 had better games.
And your friendly reply is.... :wink:
Maybe this should be a thread unto itself...
A friendly debate yes, not an heated arguement. I love talking games stuff like this. Having tried to sell more N64's was a goal of mine at work because of what I thought.dreemernj said:Tim Static said:I'm def not wanting to start an arguement, but what makes you say that?MastaDev said:get off psx tim....it owned n64 by far...
Popularity dosnt mean quality....
I was workig at Best Buy as the Media Asst. Supervisor during the time of the release of the N64 & PSX., as well as the next couple years after that.
The PSX def had more titles to choose from, but seriously, how many of those games, against the number of games released were seriously classics? How many magazines and web sites did PSX games win awards and such for? Hardly any. I'm not toally anti-PSX, hell, I own a PS3 and a PSP which I use more than any of my other consoles, but there are not that many PSX games that have stood the stand of time like alot of the better N64 titles, like Mario 64 & Zelda OoT. The N64 did have alot fewer games, mostly due to the higher cost to produce cartridges, and overall, the N64 had better games.
And your friendly reply is.... :wink:
Maybe this should be a thread unto itself...
LoL, yes you did want to start an argument. Otherwise you wouldn't have posted a PSX is trash message when it had nothing to do with the thread. You went out of your way to start something. And you did it with off-base fanboy talk.
N64 fanboys always forget things like Superman 64.
Actually, the worse game of that generation was on PSX. It was relatively famous for the time for scoring a big ZERO in Game Players. It was a futuristic racing game where collision detection was not programmed in -- making it barely playable. The title's name escapes me right now.Tim Static said:A friendly debate yes, not an heated arguement. I love talking games stuff like this. Having tried to sell more N64's was a goal of mine at work because of what I thought.dreemernj said:Tim Static said:I'm def not wanting to start an arguement, but what makes you say that?MastaDev said:get off psx tim....it owned n64 by far...
Popularity dosnt mean quality....
I was workig at Best Buy as the Media Asst. Supervisor during the time of the release of the N64 & PSX., as well as the next couple years after that.
The PSX def had more titles to choose from, but seriously, how many of those games, against the number of games released were seriously classics? How many magazines and web sites did PSX games win awards and such for? Hardly any. I'm not toally anti-PSX, hell, I own a PS3 and a PSP which I use more than any of my other consoles, but there are not that many PSX games that have stood the stand of time like alot of the better N64 titles, like Mario 64 & Zelda OoT. The N64 did have alot fewer games, mostly due to the higher cost to produce cartridges, and overall, the N64 had better games.
And your friendly reply is.... :wink:
Maybe this should be a thread unto itself...
LoL, yes you did want to start an argument. Otherwise you wouldn't have posted a PSX is trash message when it had nothing to do with the thread. You went out of your way to start something. And you did it with off-base fanboy talk.
N64 fanboys always forget things like Superman 64.
I dont think the PSX is thrash, I just have my reasons of why I think its overrated though.
And yes the worst game ever was a N64 game :cry: I remember getting that game in and thinking, "oh sweet, a Superman game. I cannot wait to play this!"
Oh dear did that game suck so bad.
It was a spam bot/account. 8 posts today bumping threads with just "bump".Please stop bumping old threads unless you have something to contribute to them.