RM AtK!
aka - RM_AtK !
i voted djt mit @daddydab32ho @R.E.O.
Last edited:
Even to the point that he was completely omitted from the poll, lol.SonicFox must have really gotten to you for you to make this thread man lol.
But didn't he some type of way inspire you to make this thread because you was arguing with him about hes fundamentals arent't that good? Would this topic of discussion would even be on your mine if u never argued with him?I lose to some people regularly. I am not a salty individual.
Again, this thread has nothing to do with Sonic Fox. However, it is true that some character specialists are simply not good candidates for "best fundamentals" (i.e., Bane, Batgirl, Martian Manhunter, Zod).
As were Jupiter, King, Perfect Legend, White Boy, and many others. I must have lost to all of them last night too.Even to the point that he was completely omitted from the poll, lol.
I agree. I think Cowboy understands the mid range game like nobody else does. He does jump a lot in Injustice, though.I've played pretty much every top player in mk9 and injustice and the player I was always most impressed with on a fundamental basis would be cowboy
Fair enough.As were Jupiter, King, Perfect Legend, White Boy, and many others. I must have lost to all of them last night too.
The reality is that some character specialists are simply not a good indication of fundamentals. But if I had to rank Sonic Fox's fundamentals, he would be around 25-30 on my list.
I agree. I think Cowboy understands the mid range game like nobody else does. He does jump a lot in Injustice, though.
Wait a minute, King is by no way a character specialist. He is infamously known as THE counter picker. What gives him success if not a high level of fundamentals?As were Jupiter, King, Perfect Legend, White Boy, and many others. I must have lost to all of them last night too.
The reality is that some character specialists are simply not a good indication of fundamentals.
Didn't you hear? It has nothing to do with you, nothing at all. It is a complete coincidence that M2Dave made this thread today.Lol wow he actually made a thread after our argument
Fool, counter-picking is the opposite of fundamentals. Counter-picking means you do not trust your ability to win an even or a slightly unfavorable match. King is from my scene. I have lots of respect for him, but my opinions are unbiased. You get little to no props for winning a possible 8:2 match up, and I am NOT talking about Martian Manhunter versus Zod. Batman versus Catwoman is an even match. If beating Catwoman with Aquaman is an indication of fundamentals, then you have no idea what fundamentals are.Wait a minute, King is by no way a character specialist. He is infamously known as THE counter picker. What gives him success if not a high level of fundamentals?
Yep, that is exactly what I said.Fool, counter-picking is the opposite of fundamentals. Counter-picking means you do not trust your ability to win an even or a slightly unfavorable match. King is from my scene. I have lots of respect for him, but my opinions are unbiased. You get little to no props for winning a possible 8:2 match up, and I am NOT talking about Martian Manhunter versus Zod. Batman versus Catwoman is an even match. If beating Catwoman with Aquaman is an indication of fundamentals, then you have no idea what fundamentals are.
In our set yesterday you tried to counter pick all of my characters with aquaman, sinestro, or Zod.Fool, counter-picking is the opposite of fundamentals. Counter-picking means you do not trust your ability to win an even or a slightly unfavorable match. King is from my scene. I have lots of respect for him, but my opinions are unbiased. You get little to no props for winning a possible 8:2 match up, and I am NOT talking about Martian Manhunter versus Zod. Batman versus Catwoman is an even match. If beating Catwoman with Aquaman is an indication of fundamentals, then you have no idea what fundamentals are.