This "there has to be 4 YOMI players" in the top 5 is baffling. We don't go on your merits as a team (however godlike it is), we go on your merits as individual players. Yes, YOMI have dominated, as you'd expect them to since they're insanely good players. But other than the Terry Brothers, which two players have better individual records than say, Foxy? It's absolutely ludicrous to say "YOMI is all over to 8's, so a YOMI player has to be over him." Well, you guys have like half a million top players. So even when one has an off tournament, somebody else will take his place in top 8 from YOMI. Which means there's always going to be YOMI because they constitute about 70% of legit big guns in most majors (just throwing a number out of my ass). Now, this means they're a great team with both quantity and quality, but you're kinda comparing an individual's resume (again, taking Foxy as an example) to that of a whole fucking team, which is insane, because it's basically one man against a crew. Like, seriously, it's like it's Foxy's record vs. the combined placings of REO, King, Slayer, etc... Even though if you take each one of them individually, he's got a better record than all of them.
I don't mind King comparing his own record to Foxy or Honeybee. There's an argument to be made for consistency. But saying there HAS to be 4 YOMI guys, even if he's just arguing in favor of his friends, is kinda nuts.
Here's an example: Imagine if say, the OKC Thunder are dominating the western conference next year. The All-Star break comes along, and someone claims there HAS to be at least FOUR Thunder players on Team West because OKC have dominated, even though Durant and Westbrook were the ones who stood out and played terrific every game, while the other 3 players took turns playing well on different nights. Yet someone will claim "No, James Harden shouldn't be on the team, it should be someone from OKC because they've been dominant from day 1" even though individually, he's played better than any of the other 3 OKC players and led his team to having a great record.
I know, not an exactly analogy so please spare me the nit-picky differences, but I'm just highlighting a point.
!
.
