It's not so much theoretically winning a half a round, but rather that some matchups are definitely pushing to nearly a higher advantage/disadvantage, but not quite being that next number. That's where the .5s come in, to signal a matchup that's slightly easier/harder than the main number suggests.I'm against it. How the hell do you win a .5 round?
.5 is one half which is a fraction, and being more specific than 1/2, which is questionably too specific anyways is just dumb.Nay. Fractions are more accurate than decimals.
I was being facetious. And now the joke is ruined..5 is one half which is a fraction, and being more specific than 1/2, which is questionably too specific anyways is just dumb.
I just don't get how in 10 matches someone will win 6.5 times out of that 10. Do you know what I mean?It's not so much theoretically winning a half a round, but rather that some matchups are definitely pushing to nearly a higher advantage/disadvantage, but not quite being that next number. That's where the .5s come in, to signal a matchup that's slightly easier/harder than the main number suggests.
Yeah, I know. I guess if you look at it as 100 matches rather than just 10, then it works out better.I just don't get how in 10 matches someone will win 6.5 times out of that 10. Do you know what I mean?
Easy, win 6 matches, and on the 7th match rage quit after you win the 1st round. Thus... 6.5I just don't get how in 10 matches someone will win 6.5 times out of that 10. Do you know what I mean?
so if CD plays Tom brady and CD beats brady 9-1I just don't get how in 10 matches someone will win 6.5 times out of that 10. Do you know what I mean?
its mortal kombat.5s seem to take into account a random factor which is completely unchartable due to the way fighting games are played.