A couple things.
The 'Special Thanks' testers that are only there for a week to find craziness shouldn't be banned. The game gets drastically changed by the time it's all done and its usually broke as hell to the point they don't even really get to learn the core of the game. Regardless, does anyone really put that much weight in the first couple majors anyway? Even if you ban the testers, the tournament is still gonna be filled with gimmicks, zoning, and blatant abuse of moves that people don't know how to deal with them yet. Nobody knows what the hell is going on yet in the game anyway.
Reo, Tom and Chris G were the main testers going around wrecking shop. Reo and Chris G are just top players period. Chris G was beating me and 16 Bit's ass after 2 or 3 days of playing the game when we had been playing for months. He's a freak. Reo is also just a great player. Are we really saying those wins are frauds? Tom got to play the game the most outside of 16 Bit and myself. I believe he was at NRS for 2 weeks and also got to play the game a lot with PL and CD Jr for the Prima guide. He probably benefited the most from the early testing.
Me and 16 Bit didn't even bother entering a tourney until UFGT.
So the only real gripe here is that MAYBE Tom got some fraudulent placings due to being a 'tester'.
So I guess maybe ban Tom. Poor Tom lol.