Kitana Fan
Mortal
I never play fighting games for a "balanced" roster. I don't really pay attention to tiers. If my mains in a game happen to be in a lower tier, that will not deter me from continuing to use them.
And right you are .I never play fighting games for a "balanced" roster. I don't really pay attention to tiers. If my mains in a game happen to be in a lower tier, that will not deter me from continuing to use them.
sure . evade the question .oh no I am new to fighting games I haven't been around all that long what is cyrax?
Mileena and Harley are really good thoughI played Mileena and Harley Quinn. And Jade in the beta.
I don’t care about tiers. I just like having fun when I play.
You have little over a week to cancel your preorder.fuck you say to me? that's it, I'm canceling my preorder
Are they? I dunno I don’t pay any attention whatsoever to tier lists. But I don’t think I saw any top players use them. I believe Mileena was super unsafe wasn’t she? I used Piercing exclusively. Maybe she got better through patches after I stopped playing?Mileena and Harley are really good though
Jade is good in this game. She was my main on the beta. Stop all of Kabal tricks and force him to fight and not throw blades.I played Mileena and Harley Quinn. And Jade in the beta.
I don’t care about tiers. I just like having fun when I play.
Very well put.Yeah, I never got this. Like when Deathstroke was nerfed from broken to mid-tier in IGAU, everyone just complained that he was ruined and gave up on him. It's like, if you really love a character, mid tier should be good enough. And if you specifically need a high tier char because you're focused on winning money (which is a valid approach for the top % of tourney players) then you can't expect every character you like to fit that bill.
Especially now, since 'mid-tier' doesn't mean what it meant back in the MK9 days, where the top characters were left 7-3'ing (or worse) much of the cast.
I will always stand by the claim that Noob Saibot is mid tier because he's pretty easy to counter. He's still a great character, just that a lot of his tools are only "outstanding" on paper and not in execution.Balance in fighting games is complex.
Some characters are just inevitably going to be better than others and there is no getting around that.
While these higher tier characters might have more winning matchups, some developers focus more on making sure these strong fighters have a few bad matchups so they can have similar win-rates compared to the players who play mid-tier characters in a given community.
The way they do this is to buff characters that counter these top tiers enough that the amount of these counter characters in a playerbase increases. This evens things out for other characters in the long run because the top tiers will run into bad matchups as often as mid-tiers would.
The point is, in a community over time, mid tiers and high tiers end up having very similar levels of success. As long as a character doesn't lose the majority of it's matchups, it should be viable.
You could see this kind of "buffing the counters instead of nerfing the strong" balancing--around-the-community in games like League of Legends and Overwatch too and it's based on the algorithm called "Fictitious Play".
Knowing this, will you still use a character if they might be mid-tier?
Will you pick up a character that fills in your character's bad matchups?
Was Cryomancer bad? I only really got into MKX in the months leading up to MK11's launch, but I mained Cryomancer Sub and had pretty consistent success with it.To be fair, Cryomamcer and Kenjutsu are still shit