You just can't HELP urself THTB! I love it.You know who's really S-tier?
- what about Virtua Fighter 5: Final Showdown? All of these fighting games must be broken. I keep seeing the letter S in every tier list. Seriously, man, S does not mean "broken" tier. You have to get over it.Nori said:S tier in Tekken exists because none of the games are balanced. You literally do see the same chars win tournaments. Just because a select few (not the majority, not half, not a quarter, a few) have horrible matchups, doesn't mean you get to slap the "S" tier tag on chars. It gives off the wrong impression to gamers who like to cop out when they lose and blame the "broken" chars. S tier suggest broken, that's just how it is. You look at the majority of tier lists and S tier 99% of the time is broke tier. KL is not broke, nor is Raiden or Reptile or anybody else you can think of, in this particular game.
Vanilla Sagat did not win anything in the USA? You serious? I don't have the time to pull up every major a Sagat player has won in the US. Vanilla sagat IS a broken char, regardless if SRK is full of whiners. Just look at tourney results, it's right there. I've been entering tournaments since 01, and this is by far one of the most balanced games to date, there is no reason for all this S tier and god tier going on, cause it doesn't exist.
And when I say balanced, I mean generally, any char can win. Are some harder than others? Yes, of course. EVERY "balanced" game has bad matchups. And there is no perfectly balanced game where every char is 5-5. That game doesn't exist and that's clearly not what I'm saying.
those numbers are kinda dumb though...its really not far-fetched to have a good stryker player beat a good kung lao player.Back on topic. Forget the letters. MK cannot be balanced when a character like Sindel loses 8:2 to Kung Lao or a character like Stryker who loses 8:2 to Kabal. Balanced game do not have such lopsided match ups.
Despite what you may think, Virtua Fighter 5: Final Showdown, Tekken 6, Tekken 5: DR, and Super Street Fighter IV are fairly balanced games and all use the letter S. Balanced and unbalanced fighting games alike use the letter S to denote their top tier characters. Rathalos is probably correct when he says that the Japanese have influenced the way people create tier lists. Most high level players use the letter S. It is here to stay. Please get used to it.Nori said:So your ONLY defense is that VF uses it and it's ok? That's your major defense? It's not for me "get over". I've been entering fighting game tournaments since 2001. I know for a fact players coming to a game and seeing S tier, they know that list is broken. It's just hot it is. Maybe not in m2dave's world, but to everybody else, S tier is widely considered broken/overpowered tier. I mentioned several games that have S tier and you dismissed it.......just because you felt like it. And VF is the one you count. No, that's not how it works, sorry.
With very few exceptions, none of those characters neither beat nor do they go even against the top tier characters. At a high level, only the top tier characters matter. Noob may beat Sheeva and Baraka. No one cares because he loses to every top tier character not named Johnny Cage. If you know as much about fighting games as you claim, you know that the better and weaker characters become more apparent in time.Nori said:Sindel has favorable matchups. So does Noob. Quan Chi is not low tier. Stryker has good matchups too. Ask Vulcan Hades, he'll write you a novel about it. Not sure where you are going w/the chars needing buffs, I don't think I ever mentioned anybody not needing buffs.
I will let Vulcan Hades deal with this one.galindo said:those numbers are kinda dumb though...its really not far-fetched to have a good stryker player beat a good kung lao player.
Fixed the last part for youHowever, SJ is still very notable with CDjr's win. And it's not just that he won the tourny, but he won it in winners bracket with the mid/mid-ish tier against the very high/S tier/super broken/overpowered/unstoppable/please nerf these chars
Would you prefer A++ tier instead?It is a very simple request to not use "s" tier in matchup/tier threads. Everybody seems to understand this concept of what I'm saying
Sure. Honestly, I feel A tier is top tier. It's very simple, this has been done for years. A tier was always top, B tier was always mid, C was always low and D you just stood far away from (Sheeva for example)Would you prefer A++ tier instead?
He is too optimistic for his own good...I will let Vulcan Hades deal with this one.
Honestly it doesn't matter and sending everyone down a letter would mean sheeva, stryker, and sindel will be F tier, which to many people (the same who believe that S tier = God tier) means completely UNPLAYABLE.Sure. Honestly, I feel A tier is top tier. It's very simple, this has been done for years. A tier was always top, B tier was always mid, C was always low and D you just stood far away from (Sheeva for example)
That's my point I'm trying to get across (one of many). They are NOT unplayable. For certain, Stryker is far from unplayable. Didn't you just see a Sheeva (Michael Bolton I think) get top 8 w/her recently? So no, nobody needs to "move down" at all. Here, tier list like it should be:Honestly it doesn't matter and sending everyone down a letter would mean sheeva, stryker, and sindel will be F tier, which to many people (the same who believe that S tier = God tier) means completely UNPLAYABLE.
Yes, this is another simple solution. See? Everybody understands what I'm saying. There is hope for humanity yetHow about instead of letters we use words? Top, upper, mid, lower, bottom.
lol you're awfully cocky since you beat me online.He is too optimistic for his own good...
They could be called Cookie Tier, Banana Tier, Cupcake Tier and Muffin Tier for all I care. It doesn't matter what the tiers are called, you just have to see what other characters are in that tier.Yes, this is another simple solution. See? Everybody understands what I'm saying. There is hope for humanity yet
A solution to a problem that only you felt needed to be pointed out btw.Yes, this is another simple solution. See? Everybody understands what I'm saying. There is hope for humanity yet
Lmao. Seriously dude? Haters gonna hate.We all know you get so emotional when you get trolled. It's so easy to get you all upset that's why you get trolled. Im surprised you have not made a Bradycast crying about how the mk community is treating you like how you did with the doa one. Anyways, ima let this thread focus on the real topic. Later.
Sheeva > sub zero. Bad match up. Lol
Quite a few people agree w/me, so clearly it's not just me brother. I'm just like anybody else, if I see an issue I'm trying to have it addressed. Simple as that.A solution to a problem that only you felt needed to be pointed out btw.
Quality over quantity. Did you watch the stream for Evo? Many of those 500 players did not know how to play the game. Summer Jam had 60 players, almost all of who are prominent and dedicated MK players in the community.rev0lver said:m2dave, I agree with much of what you're saying, but I don't see how you think the Summer Jam placements are more indicative of this game's balance than Evo. Summer Jam had like 40-some participants. Evo had over 500. Statistics are much more accurate with a larger sample, and I feel it was mainly the very dedicated and local players who braved Irene to go to Summer Jam.
You are missing important elements of ST. For example, while Dhalsim vs. Zangief is 8:2 in ST, if Zangief manages to corner Dhalsim, he can tick SPD Dhalsim to death because of his lack of a reversal attack. Dhalsim is difficult to corner, but the small opportunity is there for Zangief to pull off a "random" win. What can Sindel do vs. Kung Lao? He will annihilate her as soon as he approaches. Sindel cannot pull off a "random" win.THTB said:And having 8:2 matchups don't really make for imbalance, when they're pretty sparingly there. ST had 8:2s in far more places than you can probably count, and the game is hailed as very balanced and the bottom tiers are widely considered competitive still.