RM slacked
Shinnok trash from Canada.
real talk where's deathstroke nrs
People are questioning it and people have been saying the same thing I said, hence why this post was made.
I maintain that Canary must have been like first or second in the line of characters cut from the first game. It would be a crime if NRS didn't revisit it.
But you can hard confirm her tho lol just like you can confirm Harley and joker and cyborg. DC household names and justice league members in the DCEU with solo movies will be in haha
Wonder Woman is THE female face of DC, of course she has a 100% guaranteed spot here!!
All I want is Wonder Woman, Enchantress, Zatanna, Black Canary, Poison Ivy, Hawkgirl, Supergirl (yaaaay), Star Sapphire, Starfire nd Catwoman.
I WANT MORE THAN JUST 8 FEMALES THIS TIME AROUND!! I think it's time to stop gender discrimination.
No you can't because there has been zero evidence suggesting any of them will be in it. Zero.
Did either of them say "Wonder Woman is in Injustice 2"?When the freaking head of DC Creative does an interview with Ed Boon you can be sure most of the characters that appear in their most expensive projects (movies, TV shows) will get a push in other forms of media. Hence, why people say Wonder Woman is a given.
Because, again, Supergirl was an 'out of left field' choice, even with her own TV show getting renewed and a push in the DC Girls brand.
Like, they said it was an 'unexpected' hit. Meaning; we sure have our eye on it now and we're going to push the 'Injustice' IP just like the 'Dark Knight Returns' IP, just like the 'Watchmen' IP etc...
There is no 'proof' (pictures/video/code) as of yet. We all know they'll drag it out as much as they can. "Brand synergy" and all of that.
I can assure you, Supergirl's inclusion was decided long before the first episode of her show was broadcast.Because, again, Supergirl was an 'out of left field' choice, even with her own TV show getting renewed and a push in the DC Girls brand.
We can hard confirm them? Really? Show me the evidence where NRS tells us that they're in the game or point out the part in the reveal trailer where they say that and you might have a chance of being right. Otherwise it's assumption, simple.
We're not the ones missing the point, the assumption that CoRzz or anyone in this thread thinks Wonder Woman isn't going to be in the game came from a misunderstanding by you guys.
You just get me, Youph.
That's the whole point. You guys say "oh you're just assuming WoWo will be in" and then turn around and put Ra's on the list. Kinda hard to acknowledge your side of the argument when it's full of contradictions.
I'm basing Ra's on likeness of voice and word usage. There is a method. Who else would say "every time I enter the pit, I emerge reborn"? Exact reference to Lazarus Pit, sounds like. Not just for no reason.
I totally agree, that's why there's a dog in that line.
My bad, I don't speak doge. I was born before the web.I totally agree, that's why there's a dog in that line.
So you're just gonna miss what I wrote then, ok. It's not "full of contradictions" and you would understand this if you were understanding what the whole soft confirmation thing is. He's basing it on evidence collected from what's been revealed so far. So how is soft confirming Wonder Woman the same as that when there's no evidence on her inclusion as of yet based on what we've seen?
