Look, all I'm saying if you can't look at an issue from one side only, there are always two sides to a coin and it's not because you don't like side B method that I may not help someone, or that it's not something everyone should explore if they truly want to know who they are. I was there, I struggled with everything he listed and yes my experience isn't everyone's experience, but what helped me may also help him."Nature vs. nurture" is an old myth; every complex behavior is influenced by both biology and environment. Genes just setup our predilections, but of course our life experiences (both pre- and post-natal) determine how they are expressed. Epigenetic research shows that experiences can cause some genes to activate or deactivate, so it's a constant ongoing two-way interaction. So if you're somehow trying to argue that there's no genetic component to sexual orientation simply because there is an environment component, that's deeply flawed reasoning.
You should know, your argument sounds the same as an "intelligent design" believer or climate change denier--folks with such a strongly biased cultural and political worldview that they will fight against any piece of evidence in order to protect it. No matter the facts, they try to twist them, distort them, explain them away, and always conclude "Nobody really knows [so I can keep believing what I prefer to believe]."
Whatever beliefs you hold that help you personally, I respect them and have no problem with that. Just don't distort the facts for others, especially someone in distress who's trying to figure out the world for themselves.
That's all, I don't think there's any need to clutter this thread more with personal opinions.