Frankiebonez
Noob
I have had a talk with Scheisse about this the other night. And I was wondering what other people feel about this subject. Which is better, the Control Pad, or an Arcade Stick, and for what reasons?
IMO, I think the stick is harder and slower to use, given its size and nature in this game... in a game like Street Fighter where 1/4 circle moves and double 1/4 circle moves are needed, I really think a stick prevails more. But in an environment where tapping the buttons to cancel moves with run and joystick tap motions, I honestly feel the pad is faster. When compared to an Xbox360 pad though, which is junk, the stick is 10x more precise, at least to me. A PS2 pad, or maybe an N64 controller would rule out the precision arguement, they would be equal. But still being able to do stuff like run jabs and such I think come down to being done even quicker, with less skill needed, on a pad.
I consider myself to be very good with both, better with a stick for alot of things. But I definetly still use the pad very well. I'd say, giving myself a 10/10 on a stick I'm a 9/10 on pad. If I could get to a 10/10 on a pad, and was able to use a good pad, I would consider using a pad more often and probably prefer it. The sole fact the pad is smaller, and require's tiny amounts of distance traveled to push the buttons compared to the X+1 layout of UMK3, gives it a distinct speed advantage.
Discuss!!!
IMO, I think the stick is harder and slower to use, given its size and nature in this game... in a game like Street Fighter where 1/4 circle moves and double 1/4 circle moves are needed, I really think a stick prevails more. But in an environment where tapping the buttons to cancel moves with run and joystick tap motions, I honestly feel the pad is faster. When compared to an Xbox360 pad though, which is junk, the stick is 10x more precise, at least to me. A PS2 pad, or maybe an N64 controller would rule out the precision arguement, they would be equal. But still being able to do stuff like run jabs and such I think come down to being done even quicker, with less skill needed, on a pad.
I consider myself to be very good with both, better with a stick for alot of things. But I definetly still use the pad very well. I'd say, giving myself a 10/10 on a stick I'm a 9/10 on pad. If I could get to a 10/10 on a pad, and was able to use a good pad, I would consider using a pad more often and probably prefer it. The sole fact the pad is smaller, and require's tiny amounts of distance traveled to push the buttons compared to the X+1 layout of UMK3, gives it a distinct speed advantage.
Discuss!!!