Stop overrating MK9's Balance, Injustice is better

[CCVengeance]

Only vs RunwayMafia. It's in the Bane match-up discussion. I really don't know the Bane-HG match up, I did a lot better versus his Catwoman. ;_;

Link please.I aint going through 13 pages of tears.

 

[EntwinedTodd]

How is this game more balanced? There's about 10 viable characters in mk, and about 5 in injustice.

 

[CCVengeance]

How is this game more balanced? There's about 10 viable characters in mk, and about 5 in injustice.

Bullshit.
Confirmed viable characters:
-Supes
-Bats
-WW
-DS
-Sinestro
-GL
-Aquaman
-Green Arrow
-DD
-BA
-KF
-NW
That's way more than your supposed 5.Now fuck off.

 

[TectonicSuperPlates]

The most overplayed character for top level play is Batman. He's played by almost everyone.

 

[RYX]

The most overplayed character for top level play is Batman. He's played by almost everyone.

I don't understand the concern here.

 

[TectonicSuperPlates]

I don't understand the concern here.

That there's such a wide variety of balance as people say, and yet all I see are Batman players.

 

[RYX]

That there's such a wide variety of balance as people say, and yet all I see are Batman players.

Because he's good and he's easy and takes advantage of a yet to be established meta.

Plus... He's Batman. :16Bit

 

[CCVengeance]

That there's such a wide variety of balance as people say, and yet all I see are Batman players.

You ahve to be fucking joking......
You do realize they are not palying with some random FG character,right?

 

[cyke_out]

Bullshit.
Confirmed viable characters:
-Supes
-Bats
-WW
-DS
-Sinestro
-GL
-Aquaman
-Green Arrow
-DD
-BA
-KF
-NW
That's way more than your supposed 5.Now fuck off.

I feel like Grundy, Catwoman, and Cyborg should be included in that list.

 

[CCVengeance]

I feel like Grundy, Catwoman, and Cyborg should be included in that list.

Exactly.There are more viable characters than meets the eye.
Only non-viable characters are probably Bane,Joker and MAYBE Shazam.

 

[cyke_out]

Exactly.There are more viable characters than meets the eye.
Only non-viable characters are probably Bane,Joker and MAYBE Shazam.

Yeah, it's easier to list non-viable characters than viable.

Of course the game is so early and characters that I think are useless may have something that is discovered later to propel them to the front of the pack.

 

[Issen]

How is this game more balanced? There's about 10 viable characters in mk, and about 5 in injustice.

Can we please stop talking about character viability in a three-week-old game?

 

[CCVengeance]

Can we please stop talking about character viability in a three-week-old game?

Nothing would make me happier.

 

[RWDY Nori]

Then why don't you all start using common sense and ban Kabal and Cyborg from tournaments? Usually, when characters have a tier for themselves, we ban them, right?

No, that is some pussy ass new school mindset, that is not normal at all. In what past situation was this "common sense"?

 

[SLy]

Bullshit.
Confirmed viable characters:
-Supes
-Bats
-WW
-DS
-Sinestro
-GL
-Aquaman
-Green Arrow
-DD
-BA
-KF
-NW
That's way more than your supposed 5.Now fuck off.

Not to mention Ares and Raven. Tons of Viability just a lot of closeminds.

 

[RWDY Nori]

EWGF hits high and I believe it can be sidestepped. It's not some unbeatable god-move send from the high heavens to crush everyone that doesn't learn how to do it.

If you ever truly tried to play TTT or even TTT2 on a competitive level, even though it's high and you can duck it, you'll always be convinced it's mid cause it's just THAT kind of weird move. And yes it can be sidestepped but..........do you have any idea how difficult that is to do? I have never seen anybody consistently do that in a tournament setting.

 

[CCVengeance]

Not to mention Ares and Raven. Tons of Viability just a lot of closeminds.

Thinking to hard is hazardous for some people,it seems.

 

[SLy]

If you ever truly tried to play TTT or even TTT2 on a competitive level, even though it's high and you can duck it, you'll always be convinced it's mid cause it's just THAT kind of weird move. And yes it can be sidestepped but..........do you have any idea how difficult that is to do? I have never seen anybody consistently do that in a tournament setting.

Right. Mishimas never blatantly throw it out in front of your face to even sidestep it anyway.. They throw it midscreen to keep opponents honest. It dominates when you play footsies with it.

 

[JacopeX]

No, that is some pussy ass new school mindset, that is not normal at all. In what past situation was this "common sense"?

Glad to see some hope in the kommunity.

The thing I like about top tier characters/broken characters is how players of those games approach the match up and it's a very beautiful thing to watch once the metagame begins to adapt to the brokenness of a character and when pros grind as much out as possible in order to overcome the odds against the character based on the experience and fundamentals they gained from the community they are a part of. All this bitching and complaining about balance only makes us look pretty bad tbh. I prefer we all adapt rather than cry for something to accommodate to us like sissies.

 

[ApertureBlack]

Glad to see some hope in the kommunity.

The thing I like about top tier characters/broken characters is how players of those games approach the match up and it's a very beautiful thing to watch once the metagame begins to adapt to the brokenness of a character and when pros grind as much out as possible in order to overcome the odds again the character based on the experience and fundamentals they gained . All this bitching and complaining about balance only makes us look pretty bad tbh. I prefer we all adapt rather than cry for something to accommodate to us like sissies.

You should never really accept something really broken though, that's just poor judgment.

Inb4 Lrn2adaptswitchmainsinteractables

 

[cyke_out]

You should never really accept something really broken though, that's just poor judgment.

Inb4 Lrn2adaptswitchmainsinteractables

If you don't accept it and learn about it, then you can never truly know it is broken. What might seem impossible at first, could actually be easily countered if people take the time to combat it, instead of giving up instantly and declaring it broken.

 

[ApertureBlack]

If you don't accept it and learn about it, then you can never truly know it is broken. What might seem impossible at first, could actually be easily countered if people take the time to combat it, instead of giving up instantly and declaring it broken.

Im not saying don't learn about it, by all means do. Its just once the point is reached in which it has been tested and the whatever has no legit counter or relies on the user to be stupid in order to counter it then don't accept it. People tend to blindly accept everything in games.

Again, not saying anything currently is broken, but things are certainly too safe/easy for the reward.

 

[CCVengeance]

Im not saying don't learn about it, by all means do. Its just once the point is reached in which it has been tested and the whatever has no legit counter or relies on the user to be stupid in order to counter it then don't accept it. People tend to blindly accept everything in games.

Again, not saying anything currently is broken, but things are certainly too safe/easy for the reward.

I agree with this.

 

[MorbidAltruism]

Why not a median? Why cant we learn what to complain about and what we should adapt to. It shouldn't be an either/or fallacy. Some things in the game need fixed... other things are not a problem despite the complaints. :16Bit

 

[CCVengeance]

Why not a median? Why cant we learn what to complain about and what we should adapt to. It shouldn't be an either/or fallacy. Some things in the game need fixed... other things are not a problem despite the complaints. :16Bit

And with your arrival the thread is dead.