No, that was in response to you and one other guy saying that Foxy always beats REO in tourney in response to my comment about who was the best draw for Pig
.
Here are some guys who will never make that excuse:
Saltface.
MIT
Actually, all I said in response to you claiming "the alternative would have been REO or Sonic Fox, so it could have been much worse" (in which you only mentioned players, not characters. But of course you were referring to characters because you thought Pig should be terrified by KitanaNo, that was in response to you and one other guy saying that Foxy always beats REO in tourney in response to my comment about who was the best draw for Pig
To which I gave the specific reasons for which I felt Pig was best prepared, regardless of who would beat the other; and then after REO beat f0xy later, I explained that REO used an alt at TCW so it was possible things were different between those two at ESL.
I specifically replied "which of them beats the other doesn't change who I feel Pig was best prepared for". And that's still true. But it was amusing that you guys were so emphatic about who'd beat who.
), was that Foxy beat REO when they played at the TCW and outplaced him. Never did I say "he always beat him" nor was I emphatic about who'd win if they played again. You can check my post, it was literally "well, Foxy bodied REO a TCW" which is a sensible enough response to someone claiming that facing REO is "much worse" than playing Foxy.
And yet you're making that excuse for someone else (ie REO not playing his main, despite the fact that he's been changing mains every week since the game came out). Odd.
Yeah! He had one set vs. a raiden I believe where he had that last little red sliver or just above it(enough for raiden's 1,2 I believe it is chip him out), raiden was at like 30% and he took it. Just went for it and won.
It's not an excuse. I have no doubt he'd still have lost with Quan Chi at ESL. And at that time Quan Chi wasn't actually his main at TCW -- he used him on a dare after an argument from Jr.
No, I laughed at your joke about Jupiter because it made more sense. This one doesn't.
This makes absolutely no sense. This is a simple concept, and since you seem to have trouble understanding it I'll put it in terms of MK9:
Please be on YouTube ASAP
He eventually got knocked out by sonicfox I believe they were playing for top 8 losers
Thanks for the info, this year is full of interesting wins, I would have liked to have seen an ermac in finals as well to make the mix even weirder but oh well.
Except the MK9 example was based on actual data gathered over numerous tournaments. Years of tournaments play, basically. So if you'd said it, it would have made perfect sense. Your Pig/Foxy/REO thing is based on nothing. You had no data to back up the fact that "it's much worse." So either it was a shot at Foxy (which is totally fine by the way) or you're Nostradamus.. Yes, it turns out your prediction was right, that's undeniable given the result at ESL, but I don't think your intentions were as clear as you're trying to portray.This makes absolutely no sense. This is a simple concept, and since you seem to have trouble understanding it I'll put it in terms of MK9:
Suppose someone says (in MK9) "REO or Carl is a better draw in tourney for 16 Bit -- it could have been Dizzy". Now, you'd lose your sauce with accusations that both REO and Carl have better MK9 tournament resumes. And if REO or Carl outplaced Dizzy (which happened a lot of the time), you'd say that was somehow proof that the statement was wrong.
The truth is, it's dead-on. Bit felt very comfortable matching up against REO and Carl and he'd tell you that himself, while Dizzy had his number and he never felt comfortable against him in tourney. That says nothing about which of the 3 is the better player, has the better resume, or would outplace the other. If REO would beat Dizzy at a tourney, it has absolutely no bearing on the point that REO was still a better draw for 16 Bit.
You wouldn't respond with "Well Carl beat Dizzy most recently at UFGT 2014 and has two MK EVO championships" because it has zero relevance to whether he's a better MU for Bit. It's also not a "blow up" of either REO or Carl.
If you can't understand this simple point, I'm just going to leave it here. I made a call about who it was more favorable for a specific player I know well to face -- and it was correct
