Why do I have to be a mra to point out bloated statistics to overzealous feminists? Or that somehow, even if I was, implying that MRA = anti-feminism? As if fighting for men's rights means you to seek to undo feminism at every turn. Focus on the arguments being made instead of trying to character assassinate.
Forgive me for trusting statistics and facts from the U.S Department of Justice over what I'm sure will be some quote by some choice feminist literature from the 70s to backup your claims. Look, women do make less than men. Yes. The wage gap, controlling for other factors, is an important factor to understand the mechanisms that results in this fact and to make sure that we don't attribute the wage gap to, say, discrimination. You'd rather ignore these factors and jump to sexism. Honestly, I'm surprised by the ignorance. I thought it was known that women make roughly equal money for equal work, it is the types of work they traditionally enter that have low pay.
If you've seen my posts about race then you already know that this portrait you paint of me couldn't be further from the truth.
No, again, you're putting words in my mouth. Never did I equate or imply the entire that this single act of blatant discrimination against males is much bigger than the larger and more prevalent sexual, religious, race and female discrimination.
Really, I feel like we'll just have to agree to disagree. You're making up all these phantom arguments combined with all the hit and run posts from others... it's not conducive for a healthy discussion.
