Pan1cMode
AUS FGC represent!
Your statistic is 19 years old with a poor sample size, limited scope and some biased questions.The United States Department of Justice official stat is 1 in 6. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/183781.pdf
And that's just rape, not taking into account the broader definition of "sexual assault".
The incidents of reported forcible rape in America during 2012 were 84,376.
That works out to be roughly 53 woman in 100,000 being raped each year. Now if 50% of rapes are unreported, then the statistic inflates to 106 in 100,000 women are raped per year.
Assuming that each case of rape is to a new woman, and that a woman lives 80 years, than that statistic becomes:
Incident rate*exposure
=106*80
= 8480 women per 100,000
~ 1 in 12
The actual statistic is much lower since rapes to women over 40 are statistical outliers, and not every reported rape was to a different woman. It also assumes that every reported rape was an actual rape and not a false allegation.
This is still way too many, and still an absolute abomination; but it is not 1 in 6. Sensationalism and inflated statistics only distract from the true horror of the reality. Sexual assault is bad enough, we don't need false statistics to make it worse.
So basically what you're saying is they don't like a male dominated workforce area so they choose not to pursue work in that area.... That's exactly what I'm saying. You're then making the leap that a male dominated work place = discrimination. Is it discrimination that the majority of child care workers, school teachers, nurses and kindergarten workers are female? Why aren't feminists fighting for more female garbage collectors, or truckers, or firefighters, or steel workers?No. Especially because you're talking about an anecdotal quote which is supposedly a thing you don't like. As I said, I have been involved with actual research in this. Many times, they do not WANT to hire a female with the same qualifications as a male for the same job in these fields. Some only will with affirmative action because it looks good, as @Pan1cMode mentioned.
You're missing a major part of the point though. Part of the issue of our lack of women in these jobs is explained by a lack of them studying it. There are very similar issues in acceptance to academic programs and major issues with discrimination&uncomfortability with peers/teachers within these programs, which prevents them from entering or continuing with them in the first place.
Last edited: