What's new

The Amazing Spiderman 2 Spoiler talk

Indecisive

We'll burn you all—that is your fate!
But the fact that there's a question is the problem. There's enough doubt that it wasn't Peter that caused her death and that messes with the impact of her death.
There was a Question in the Comics as well though. At the end of the day she died. Peter Failed to Save her. Whether he Killed her not isnt that big of a deal because she would have died either way.
 

Compbros

Man of Tomorrow
There was a Question in the Comics as well though. At the end of the day she died. Peter Failed to Save her. Whether he Killed her not isnt that big of a deal because she would have died either way.

Nah, no question.




She hits nothing, Spider-man snaps her neck because he quickly stops her momentum.


Here he causes her death and it weighs on him forcing him to think more about how he uses his powers and, in turn, become a better hero. In the movie he couldn't prevent her death which may lead to him simply going a bit faster or something to become better. With the comic death he learns a lesson, with the movie death he just wasn't quick enough. It's harder for him to blame himself when there was literally NOTHING he could do to save her opposed to if he did X then she wouldn't have died.


Edit: BTW, it is a big deal.
 

Briggs8417

Salt Proprietor of TYM
I am pretty much the biggest Spiderman fan I know, and I have to say that this trilogy is looking to be really good to me. This movie wasn't like the last one where it was so close to the comics it made me want to cry tears of joy, but they put their own twist on a lot of the plot and the characters and made it their own, which I really liked. I'm ok with movies changing the canon of stories as long as it's good to me, and I feel they did a really good job with that. There were a couple of things I didn't really enjoy though. I didn't like that we saw so little of Green Goblin. He is one of the smartest, dangerous and craziest villains in all of comic books imo, and he got like 5 minutes in the movie. I also wasn't a fan of the fact they didn't start with Norman, but I was ok with it because you could've made it work with Harry, but he just didn't get enough screen time to me. It felt a lot like Topher Grace in that movie with Tobey Macguire and Kirsten Dunst. (Don't you dare call that movie by the title because it doesn't deserve it) Gwen's death was done beautifully though, gotta give them that. My favorite thing about this series so far is how perfectly they portray Peter's character. It's so accurate that it hurts my insides with pleasure when I see it. The struggle is real with this man and they make sure you know it.
 

trufenix

bye felicia
Nah, no question.




She hits nothing, Spider-man snaps her neck because he quickly stops her momentum.


Here he causes her death and it weighs on him forcing him to think more about how he uses his powers and, in turn, become a better hero. In the movie he couldn't prevent her death which may lead to him simply going a bit faster or something to become better. With the comic death he learns a lesson, with the movie death he just wasn't quick enough. It's harder for him to blame himself when there was literally NOTHING he could do to save her opposed to if he did X then she wouldn't have died.


Edit: BTW, it is a big deal.
The movie is pretty clean cut on the subject too, I'm not sure where the question is. There's an audible obvious snap at the impact of the web and she immediately goes limp. Similarly, I don't think the comic ever illustrated that Stacy would've survived if he had let her fall, Goblin even says she was fucked either way.

IMO they teach the same lesson. His friends are fucked. His powers are not enough to save everyone. I don't think there was ever an inner monologue where Peter said, oh dang, I remember when I killed Gwen this way lemme make sure I let this guy fall.
 

Compbros

Man of Tomorrow
The movie is pretty clean cut on the subject too, I'm not sure where the question is. There's an audible obvious snap at the impact of the web and she immediately goes limp. Similarly, I don't think the comic ever illustrated that Stacy would've survived if he had let her fall, Goblin even says she was fucked either way.

IMO they teach the same lesson. His friends are fucked. His powers are not enough to save everyone. I don't think there was ever an inner monologue where Peter said, oh dang, I remember when I killed Gwen this way lemme make sure I let this guy fall.

You hear the snap but many say she hit the ground, including the people that worked on the film.

So, what of this weekend’s big-screen depiction of Gwen’s death? The filmmakers more or less dodged the question. While falling (inside a clock tower, not off of a bridge), Peter fires a web and snags her, but gets her too late, and her back and head hit the floor. If he’d fired sooner, would the whiplash have killed her? We’ll never know, and producer Matt Tolmach said that’s by design: “It’s not about the forensic details of that fall at all. I would say that there’s a tragic inevitability once you get into the clock tower… The cause of death here is love, commitment, personal choice.” In an interview with ScreenCrush, director Marc Webb said about the scene, "Originally, she didn’t hit the ground. She just bounced and her neck was supposed to break. But, what was interesting was people, when they watched that, the web represents salvation to people. They did not understand or believe or were not willing to accept that she had died — which is how it was done in the comics. So, we had to add a moment where there’s an impact wound. And then people understood what it meant."

I think the lesson is changed from " I wasn't good enough to save her" to, as you say, "my powers were not enough to save her" despite doing everything he could. One makes him implicit in her death through carelessness or lack of knowledge or what have you and, as such, makes him conscious of the way he does things and the consequences they carry.

For example, in a 2003 issue of Peter Parker: Spider-Man, Pete calls Gwen’s death “my fault,” recalling that his “webbing was never designed to stop anyone but me from falling. And the resultant jarring snapped her neck.” In a 2006 comic, Iron Man muses that “If [Peter]’d been properly trained, maybe he could have broken her fall without breaking her neck.”

But on a happier note, the whole incident taught Peter Parker an important lesson about physics and anatomy! In a few comics published in the past decade, Spidey has saved falling friends by making extra-sure to minimize whiplash.

To wit: In Mark Millar’s Marvel Knights Spider-Man #12 (published in 2005), Green Goblin tries to re-create Gwen’s bridge death with Mary Jane, but – ever the scientist – Peter knows how to avoid his prior error. “The SINGLE STRAND is what snapped Gwen’s neck. Just not enough support,” he thinks. “Just make it work this time. Hit every major joint.” Mary Jane is safely pulled up like a marionette, all of her joints stabilized and therefore unable to snap. In last month’s Superior Spider-Man #31, Peter snags a falling lady and thinks, “Practiced this a thousand times. Where to latch on to someone… how much counter-force to use reeling them in.”


Panel from "Marvel Knights Spider-Man #12" (art by Terry Dodson)
The movie death is more of a "I did EVERYTHING I could, it just wasn't enough". It absolves him of any wrong doing on his part especially since Gwen pushed herself into the conflict between Peter/Electro so it's much easier for him to forgive himself. It's a "my fault" vs. "my powers aren't enough" and, again, I don't think it's the same lesson.
 

xQUANTUMx

Twitter: @xxQUANTUM
They touched on it but I feel it was a bit muted. Gwen's death is a flashpoint just like uncle Ben. She needs to die for him to become what he eventually does. And at least in this iteration, we have room to introduce MJ properly.
 

Briggs8417

Salt Proprietor of TYM
You hear the snap but many say she hit the ground, including the people that worked on the film.




I think the lesson is changed from " I wasn't good enough to save her" to, as you say, "my powers were not enough to save her" despite doing everything he could. One makes him implicit in her death through carelessness or lack of knowledge or what have you and, as such, makes him conscious of the way he does things and the consequences they carry.



The movie death is more of a "I did EVERYTHING I could, it just wasn't enough". It absolves him of any wrong doing on his part especially since Gwen pushed herself into the conflict between Peter/Electro so it's much easier for him to forgive himself. It's a "my fault" vs. "my powers aren't enough" and, again, I don't think it's the same lesson.
I think you are kind of just nitpicking here tbh. Do you really think Peter would feel THAT much less guilty over everything that happened? Peter isn't one to discern the difference between my powers aren't enough, and I wasn't enough because to him there isn't that much of a difference. He is the reason Harry became the way he was in the movie in a way, so if he would've just tried to help in the first place the situation wouldn't have came to be what it was in the end. I'm not saying you don't bring up a decent point, but in the eyes of Peter I think he doesn't discern the difference because of the type of person he is in the story.
 

Compbros

Man of Tomorrow
I think you are kind of just nitpicking here tbh. Do you really think Peter would feel THAT much less guilty over everything that happened? Peter isn't one to discern the difference between my powers aren't enough, and I wasn't enough because to him there isn't that much of a difference. He is the reason Harry became the way he was in the movie in a way, so if he would've just tried to help in the first place the situation wouldn't have came to be what it was in the end. I'm not saying you don't bring up a decent point, but in the eyes of Peter I think he doesn't discern the difference because of the type of person he is in the story.

Absolutely he is, there are plenty of times it's like "you did everything you could, it's not your fault, you can't blame yourself". There's no way to console Peter after Gwen's death with those words because it's not true and he knows it, he didn't do everything he could and it is his fault so he blames himself. Do you believe that Peter can't tell the difference between "why have these powers if they're not enough to save the people I care about?" and "I caused her death because of how I used my powers"? If so then why did he work so hard to make sure it doesn't happen again like in the MJ panel? He knows that's a point where HE failed, not his powers failing him. I DO think Peter feels more guilty about the way Gwen died opposed to her dying by something he couldn't prevent. Why wouldn't he be MORE guilty over a preventable death he caused?

If he had helped Harry then wouldn't the same thing happen since it was the Spider venom that messed him up? Or would the Venom mixed with Peter's blood allow for some string to be extracted? From my understanding the Spiders that were spliced/created were only compatible with the DNA of Richard or his offspring so how would the results be different?
 

SneakyTortoise

Official Master of Salt
I thought it was a lot better than the first. Main issues though:

1. Why does every super hero film nowadays feel like it has to follow the marvel-Avengers set up style? This film would have been far better if it had left out the rhino crap and not bothered with harry as much but instead focussed more on electro. I know they're setting up for the sinister six, but what happened to stand alone films rather than set ups?

2. WTF was up with electro's suit after harry frees him? Where the hell did he get that from??

3. In the trailer they showed a scene where harry tells peter that oscorp has him under surveillance, this was not in the film, at least not in the U.K version
 

trufenix

bye felicia
You hear the snap but many say she hit the ground, including the people that worked on the film.
My point is, even if she hits the ground, the audible snap still happens. The floor didn't make any part of her snap, and the interview excerpt seems to indicate the floor was added for all those people who don't believe the snap, not to replace the snap. Its not like her neck snapped and she was okay then her head hits the floor. She simply couldn't have survived, there was nothing Peter could do to save her, which is the same lesson as the comic.

I think the lesson is changed from " I wasn't good enough to save her" to, as you say, "my powers were not enough to save her" despite doing everything he could. One makes him implicit in her death through carelessness or lack of knowledge or what have you and, as such, makes him conscious of the way he does things and the consequences they carry.
I think you're giving 70s era comic writing too much credit. Goblin told Peter to pick heroism or her. He picked both and he can't have both so he loses both. That's the lesson. Even if Stan Lee didn't write a "perfect" Kobayashi Maru scenario, it's clear from Goblin's dialogue on the very next page that she was supposed to be dead either way.

The movie death is more of a "I did EVERYTHING I could, it just wasn't enough". It absolves him of any wrong doing on his part especially since Gwen pushed herself into the conflict between Peter/Electro so it's much easier for him to forgive himself. It's a "my fault" vs. "my powers aren't enough" and, again, I don't think it's the same lesson.
30 years of writing later it makes sense that someone else could write in some caveats, make some references and even give Peter some learning experiences from it. It's no different when guys 10 years later go back and say, oh well that happened because it was a clone. Simple fact is there's nothing in the original story that illustrates negligence on Peter's part. Well, not in his technique, anyway. Even after the Goblin gets fucking gutted and he realizes how hollow vengeance is, Peter doesn't express remorse about not having trained for this situation or whatever. There's no epilogue about Peter practicing newer safer web catches, nor improving his speed swing to beat Goblin up to her, or even his left hook to knock Goblin out in one punch. Peter's next move was to come to term with the fact that he can't have it all.
 

DarkPage

Dojo Trainee
I agree with whoever said that he's a better spiderman but Toby was a better Peter.
Dude allllllll the feeeeellllls, when Gwen died, you could really feel for him, they laid the ground work for it and really made her a character you cared about, both individual and like for peter.
I thought the ending was fine too

And man the music and just overall ambiance of electro was sooo crazy cool.
The only thing that bothered me for some reason is when the dude asked max who he was and he's like " didn't you know, I'm electro" like just off the dome like that, how would he have known lol

But the speech right before that was sick
 

Briggs8417

Salt Proprietor of TYM
Absolutely he is, there are plenty of times it's like "you did everything you could, it's not your fault, you can't blame yourself". There's no way to console Peter after Gwen's death with those words because it's not true and he knows it, he didn't do everything he could and it is his fault so he blames himself. Do you believe that Peter can't tell the difference between "why have these powers if they're not enough to save the people I care about?" and "I caused her death because of how I used my powers"? If so then why did he work so hard to make sure it doesn't happen again like in the MJ panel? He knows that's a point where HE failed, not his powers failing him. I DO think Peter feels more guilty about the way Gwen died opposed to her dying by something he couldn't prevent. Why wouldn't he be MORE guilty over a preventable death he caused?

If he had helped Harry then wouldn't the same thing happen since it was the Spider venom that messed him up? Or would the Venom mixed with Peter's blood allow for some string to be extracted? From my understanding the Spiders that were spliced/created were only compatible with the DNA of Richard or his offspring so how would the results be different?
I'm agreeing with you on all of that, there is a difference between the two, but Peter is the type of person who is going to keep feeling guilty about it no matter the circumstances. Yeah he feels more guilty about about Gwen than the rest because of his feelings for her as well as the circumstance, but I don't really see that as a reason to go nitpicking between the two for the movies. He never stops feeling guilty about any of the people who have died around him whether he could've did something or not. So with Hollywood trying their own thing for this movie series I don't think it's so bad, but I do prefer the way it was done in the comics for sure. I found it really weird how close and tight nit the first movie was with canon, and how with the second movie they just decided to go completely off key. That was where a lot of my original skepticism came from. I have to say it was way better than I thought it was going to be, but it definitely wasn't the best spidey movie, which imo was the last one.
 

Indecisive

We'll burn you all—that is your fate!
I thought it was a lot better than the first. Main issues though:

1. Why does every super hero film nowadays feel like it has to follow the marvel-Avengers set up style? This film would have been far better if it had left out the rhino crap and not bothered with harry as much but instead focussed more on electro. I know they're setting up for the sinister six, but what happened to stand alone films rather than set ups?

2. WTF was up with electro's suit after harry frees him? Where the hell did he get that from??

3. In the trailer they showed a scene where harry tells peter that oscorp has him under surveillance, this was not in the film, at least not in the U.K version
The american Version didnt have either. i was waiting for it and it never happened. I was Confused By this.

I agree with whoever said that he's a better spiderman but Toby was a better Peter.
Dude allllllll the feeeeellllls, when Gwen died, you could really feel for him, they laid the ground work for it and really made her a character you cared about, both individual and like for peter.
I thought the ending was fine too

And man the music and just overall ambiance of electro was sooo crazy cool.
The only thing that bothered me for some reason is when the dude asked max who he was and he's like " didn't you know, I'm electro" like just off the dome like that, how would he have known lol

But the speech right before that was sick
Im pretty sure he was captured for a while so he had time to think about the name
 

DarkPage

Dojo Trainee
The american Version didnt have either. i was waiting for it and it never happened. I was Confused By this.



Im pretty sure he was captured for a while so he had time to think about the name
Well I just meant why would He go "didn't you know ?" Like as if it was common knowledge when it was just off the top totally trivial but just something that I had thought about while watching
 

SneakyTortoise

Official Master of Salt
The american Version didnt have either. i was waiting for it and it never happened. I was Confused By this.
Me too, it was a scene I was actually looking forward to because it is a bit of an "Oh shiiiiit" moment and could have set a different tone of the film. Studios have actually been sued for this kind of stuff before which is funny. Do you have any idea where his suit came from too? I thought he looked cooler in a black hoodie
 

SneakyTortoise

Official Master of Salt
Well I just meant why would He go "didn't you know ?" Like as if it was common knowledge when it was just off the top totally trivial but just something that I had thought about while watching
Because it rhymes. And rhyming is cool, you fool ;)
 

Indecisive

We'll burn you all—that is your fate!
Me too, it was a scene I was actually looking forward to because it is a bit of an "Oh shiiiiit" moment and could have set a different tone of the film. Studios have actually been sued for this kind of stuff before which is funny. Do you have any idea where his suit came from too? I thought he looked cooler in a black hoodie
Either Harry Gave him the Suit, The Took it from the Place he was Captured Or he made it himself. I thought the Hoodie was Fine. But the Suit was Interesting. Also He had that thing in his head still showing his Eletrical Levels. That was Probably put in while he was captured.
 

Indecisive

We'll burn you all—that is your fate!
Well I just meant why would He go "didn't you know ?" Like as if it was common knowledge when it was just off the top totally trivial but just something that I had thought about while watching
Didnt you know Im Indecisive. I get what your saying. It was probably the only way they could think of a way for the people watching to know his name.
 

SneakyTortoise

Official Master of Salt
Either Harry Gave him the Suit, The Took it from the Place he was Captured Or he made it himself. I thought the Hoodie was Fine. But the Suit was Interesting. Also He had that thing in his head still showing his Eletrical Levels. That was Probably put in while he was captured.
Yeah I figured the thing on his head was from him being captured, although I don't think I noticed it until he had the suit on which is weird, when I watch it again I might keep an eye open to see if he does actually have it when he kills the guards.

But I don't know where harry could have gotten it from because he didn't have access to special projects and I don't think they would have searched the prison for that. I just thought it looked a bit weird and the fact that it appeared out of nowhere made it even worse
 

BunLantern

Long live b13 minigun
Did the post credit scene guarantee an Xmen/Spiderman crossover or was it just a random Xman teaser by Marvel for the new movie?
 

Indecisive

We'll burn you all—that is your fate!
Yeah I figured the thing on his head was from him being captured, although I don't think I noticed it until he had the suit on which is weird, when I watch it again I might keep an eye open to see if he does actually have it when he kills the guards.

But I don't know where harry could have gotten it from because he didn't have access to special projects and I don't think they would have searched the prison for that. I just thought it looked a bit weird and the fact that it appeared out of nowhere made it even worse
Your right it is weird.
 

SneakyTortoise

Official Master of Salt
Random Xman Teaser. Sony Owns Xmen also. So they decided to put that in there.
Not really random, the director of Spiderman was under contractual ties with Fox to do another film but they came to an agreement to release him from these ties as long as Sony put an X-men mini-trailer at the end of Spiderman. Not trying to be pedantic, just thought it was quite interesting and cool to see these studios working together to benefit each other.