PunkMafia83
PSN: YaRnToNpUnKMAFIA
Huh, dat pre patch black adam though?Martian is worst than Superman. I rather fight pre patch Superman.
Huh, dat pre patch black adam though?Martian is worst than Superman. I rather fight pre patch Superman.
Main issue w this is no one will travel ever to any other events other than prestigious ones and new ones won't stand a chance in growthI disagree with 9 month rule I feel like everything should be tallied in from the beginning and end of a games life. Unless you do different versions like Street Fighter has SF4, SSF4, SSF4AE, SSF4AE2012 and USF4. For example 2011 was year of SSF4AE and Fuudo was ranked #1. Daigo was ranked #1 for SF4 and SSF4 cause he won evo in both and the most tournaments. SSF4AE2012 is infiltration cause he won evo in 2012, the 25 anniversary tourney and he got top 8 at evo this year. He is still #1 in the world rankings.
Well thing is I'm not going by any set of how many people entered or anything. I am 100% going by what they put so however prestigious the event is its up to the players to show up and reinforce that prestige. That is how I look at it anyway. I'm not adding or altering anything cause then I would be doing stuff based off my own opinion and that would screw things up. Rankings have to be 100% off already set guidelines and statistical categories. Me nor anyone else I feel is in a position to change anything.
There can be a consensus though. Our community is different than the whole Fgc. The tekken community even would probably agree that fr and ncr aren't on the same level. Different tournaments have different levels of prestige for our game, and even if it were opinionated, it would look better than a tournament our game isn't even at being ranked above our most prestigious majors.I disagree with 9 month rule I feel like everything should be tallied in from the beginning and end of a games life. Unless you do different versions like Street Fighter has SF4, SSF4, SSF4AE, SSF4AE2012 and USF4. For example 2011 was year of SSF4AE and Fuudo was ranked #1. Daigo was ranked #1 for SF4 and SSF4 cause he won evo in both and the most tournaments. SSF4AE2012 is infiltration cause he won evo in 2012, the 25 anniversary tourney and he got top 8 at evo this year. He is still #1 in the world rankings.
Well thing is I'm not going by any set of how many people entered or anything. I am 100% going by what they put so however prestigious the event is its up to the players to show up and reinforce that prestige. That is how I look at it anyway. I'm not adding or altering anything cause then I would be doing stuff based off my own opinion and that would screw things up. Rankings have to be 100% off already set guidelines and statistical categories. Me nor anyone else I feel is in a position to change anything.
The SRK ranking system is pretty much an exact copy of my system, except more limited since it doesn't allow "claiming".
They probably just stated its from the "Woman's" association to try to pretend its different from mine. I have a lot of beef with those guys and they would rather not give credence to any work I've done.
If it was up to me personally, this system would already be installed... or very close to it. However, this isn't my decision alone. I also asked the community SEVERAL months back about adding this system (it's $200) and I didn't get the best feedback.
For reasons that have been described multiple times now, we are moving towards structuring a system around the way our community works. We have our own attendance patterns, regional considerations and travel constraints.Remember, we're here for you guys... so, we are on the hunt to provide the best things possible.
There is no perfect solution. Just solutions that fit the given need.one particular system as the perfect solution
I'm not going to argue this with you here, because I've been through it before.. But ELO was created for (and is most prominently used for) a community setup that exactly mirrors ours. The Chess Federation is the FGC. They are about as close as you can possibly get. Same types of events, same fluctuating levels of interest/attendance, same mix between high and low level players, events held in hotel ballrooms, college campuses etc. Any player can enter most of the tournaments and there are few guarantees to who will be there.There is no perfect solution. Just solutions that fit the given need.
I personally believe that ATP is better for non-structured tournaments (which is how the FGC works, our tournaments are not part of circuits/leagues)... While ELO is better for structured series (and 1-on-1).
Ok but if ATP in implemented we need NON players making brackets and poolsThere is no perfect solution. Just solutions that fit the given need.
I personally believe that ATP is better for non-structured tournaments (which is how the FGC works, our tournaments are not part of circuits/leagues)... While ELO is better for structured series (and 1-on-1).
We all are in discussion lolIf it was up to me personally, this system would already be installed... or very close to it. However, this isn't my decision alone. I also asked the community SEVERAL months back about adding this system (it's $200) and I didn't get the best feedback.
@THTB @CrimsonShadow @Shock @ZAQ
Remember, we're here for you guys... so, we are on the hunt to provide the best things possible.
Actually, its not the same. In order to attend an event in the Chess Federation, you must register, under your real name. If a player is not a member of the Chess Federation, they become one right there; since rankings are recorded by legal names. When you attend a USFC event, you KNOW in advanced if it is a "sanctioned" event... the FGC has no sanctioning body.I'm not going to argue this with you here, because I've been through it before.. But ELO was created for (and is most prominently used for) a community setup that exactly mirrors ours. The Chess Federation is the FGC. They are about as close as you can possibly get. Same types of events, same fluctuating levels of interest/attendance, same mix between high and low level players, events held in hotel ballrooms, college campuses etc.
Some things are changing -- there are a lot of things that won't be done the same way in the near future. Right now everything is moving toward some sort of organization, and establishing a legitimate continuity between events.Another thing with the Chess Federation is that in order for an event to be ranked by the federation, it must be approved in advance. Tournament organizers who want their events ranked in the federation usually do so by strictly adhering to USCF guidelines and requirements for FIDE fulfillment. The FGC does not operate this way, we don't have a central body controlling all the movements and actions of all of our tournament organizers... in a community such as ours, which is so "boys-club" driven, that's not something I would even want.
I mean, if you can convince EVERY tournament organizer for Injustice in the world, to ensure that EVERY player who attends their events create an account on TYM (or they are not allowed to enter the tournament)... AND convince them to submit their FULL tournament results, linked to TYM account names immediately after each event... then go for ELO. However, TO's in the FGC are extremely unorganized. It was hard enough getting some of the TO's to handle online registration, and the majority of events are still run on paper brackets. So I don't see this happening anytime soon.
However, I am not attached to one particular system -- it's about finding the right fit. And most of the considerations that are being discussed go far beyond simply which type of system to use as the base.
So again, for those who don't know what's going on, I'd encourage you to wait and be patient. The discussion is a lot deeper and wider ranging than this.
Then not a single EC event would ever get ranked... since the major TOs on the EC are the most disorganized of them all. You think the average TOs will care about the ranking system on some random website that they don't run and don't make any money off of?We(American fgc) don't need the disorganized world tournaments to sign up to make legit world rankings. This is Murica. We have world champions in any sport, and don't care if we actually play the rest of the world. Baseball has the World Series; Basketball has the world championship. But seriously, why can't you just disregard the ones who don't have their shit together, and include the ones who do go through all the trouble to register their players, and send in the results. If you did that, wouldn't more of the disorganized players get their act together? I like the ELO idea.
If it was up to me personally, this system would already be installed... or very close to it. However, this isn't my decision alone. I also asked the community SEVERAL months back about adding this system (it's $200) and I didn't get the best feedback.
@THTB @CrimsonShadow @Shock @ZAQ
Remember, we're here for you guys... so, we are on the hunt to provide the best things possible.
While that is an unfortunate con, viable seeding is a near-necessary proAs if NRS needs another reason to compare their players though or proclaim why they are the best at the game though.
13th has same points as 9th honest mistake