Again.. This still doesnt work.
We have two of these already -- and I think people will start demanding that future seeding become more objective rather than subjective. Change is afoot and I don't think future TO's will be able to approach things the same way.
How does it not work if you base it off tournament placings? So what is a solution to fix this in your opinion?
better pool balance.
Its easier to do rankings in Organized Leagues because everyone is at every-same level event at the same time. Every team in sports plays the same amount of games before playoffs. In fighting games rankings are more... clouded because if someone goes to 5 majors and wins 1. Does that make them equal to someone whose only been to one major and wins it? Also the pool thing if you simply have 3 top players in one pool. It is guranteed that ONE will absolutely not place. Also "Balanced pools" would that be up to community interpretation or does someone make a judgement on that too? Bracketology is weird.
Again, all I have to say is we will see. Frankly, I don't ever believe a word you say. Just a day or two ago you said you were done with ALL podcasts, ALL posts on TYM, and that you were only going to browse TYM...and not post anything. Since that statement (one of many lies by the way), you have posted more than I have ever seen you post. I would highly advise that you take some good advice and not say something unless you mean it and follow through with it.
wheres mine sir i want to make my own srryimwhtecast too
You come here spewing negativity because I and many others have changed our minds on how we handle things and all the petty BS that we do. Yes.. I changed my mind. Posing like I am now and all of us trying to change the culture doesn't count as "one of many lies", it should count as "its about time".
Sorry, just thought it was funny accusing someone of hypocrisy when you can't spell it.
