I'm flattered.I always imagine you as the Official Director of KN Archives and Records.. Hehe
I'm flattered.I always imagine you as the Official Director of KN Archives and Records.. Hehe
Yeah, while the 100 people standing behind me weren't watching, I smacked PL's controller out of his hands. Because I'm not good enough to beat PL legitYou know I think King had something to do with it. It was a bit too obvious as PL quit and King was handed off a wad of cash after the fact. With King's shit-eating grin it looked as though there may have been some sort of "underhandedness" going down that may have caused the game to pause. I'm sorry but faces never lie!
While this sounds good in theory, it effectively legalizes pausing the game during your own combo (or whatever rule you make). Once again, if you give an inch, they take a mile. For example, one time I was playing a tag tournament in mk and @G4S Ermacio said all bs is allowed, presumably implying that we could do stupid tag shit. Turns out he meant that he would use the invincibility glitch to just win with Kabal. While that example is not very similar to this situation in how specific it is, I know multiple players that would pause the game during their own combo at the end of the round or whatever, and take advantage fo the time to think over and options and disrupt the flow of the match. As stupid as it can be, the best rule is that a pause equals a loss.Only thing that pissed me off was:
I went to SummerJam 7 last year and we were playing in a team tournament match, a known marvel player's stick paused on us, but since "he was comboing when he paused" we didn't have the option to take the match. I completely understood that. How is it, that PL who was COMBOING King got DQed? He could have just unpaused and finished his combo...
I knew you released some bats on his controllerYeah, while the 100 people standing behind me weren't watching, I smacked PL's controller out of his hands. Because I'm not good enough to beat PL legit
This might just be one of the stupidest post I have seen on here.You know I think King had something to do with it. It was a bit too obvious as PL quit and King was handed off a wad of cash after the fact. With King's shit-eating grin it looked as though there may have been some sort of "underhandedness" going down that may have caused the game to pause. I'm sorry but faces never lie!
You guys in this thread have opened my eyes to the injustices (no pun) that take place in the competitive world. Anderson Silva should have been allowed to finish his combo on Chris Weidman after he broke his leg in half on his shin, true story.
Bro, do you even twitter?@STORMS shouldnt this thread be closed since @Perfect Legend hasnt made a statement yet?
best post in this thread.I knew you released some bats on his controller
THISI don't even know why this is a discussion. Its been industry standard for any fighting game that if you pause during a tournament match for whatever reason, the other person can decide on what happens. Its happen to me before in street fighter and I was full mercy of my opponent. It doesn't matter the reason or why it happened. There isn't any of this you take a life bar or one round. Its the match. Always has been.
PL messed up, and instead of rebounding sucking it up and just doing what he did again to king. He got worked up and then decided to have a shouting match with Shock afterwords. I have never seen such disrespect to a T.O in a long time especially to shock.
Its been a rule for a reason ask any T.O what they will say. its up to the player who didn't pause to decide whether they take the round or not.
A simple rule could be if you have the lead and hit the pause button then the match is restarted, so you lose the advantage but not the round/game; if you don't have the lead and hit the pause button the you lose that round; now because IGAU has no rounds then the match is restarted, the oponent takes your first life bar, then wait to the timer to be set at the same time when the pause happened, and start the fight.The rules should be changed for situations when a player is clearly going to win regardless of any unfortunate accident. In those situations it shouldn't be an option to take a round or a match from a winning player. Carl was going to win that round. There was no doubt of that. Carl was going to win, so he should have been awarded the round. I would say this, though, the opposing player should be given the option of starting over or playing it from position.
Obviously, position matters more in Injustice than in other games, because in SF the round would simply reset anyway. Anyway, the rule, as it stands, is stupid. For example, If you have 3% life in SF, and I hit you with an ultra, and my controller falls out I should not lose that round. You had zero chance of winning the round, so it's pointless and unfair to award it to you. Take MK9, you have 3% life and I hit you with xray--you are going to die--but my controller disconnects. It's asinine to award the round to the dead player. Stupid rule, but since the rule exists should FK have taken it? Yes. Should the rule exist? No. I can understand awarding rounds to pauses or disconnects during active rounds, but not when a round is clearly lost.
not todayBro, do you even twitter?
It surpsies me that you post at the randomest of times...or is it that you are here all the time? /GhostOfCDJrevery single reply was worth reading
There are no rounds in injustice.The rule is that its up the opposing player if he would rather take the round (meaning 1 of the 2/3 rounds) or restart. This is after a TO confirms it was the players fault (or if the player is generous enough to admit it was his fault).
You can't just get up in the middle of a match and expect it to go by like its nothing. This is why we have button checks, to test for lag and your controller. Unfortunate shit happens indeed, but its a tournament so tough it out.
He didn't get BSed out of a win....he dropped his controller, got bodied, then acted like a child. Even if he did get "BSed out of a win", that does not give you the right to act like a little kid who didn't get his way. Well I guess it does, but it shows how immature he isSacrifice your time into going to tournaments, being financially dependent on tournaments and get BSed out of a win and tell me you wouldn't get pissed.
Doesn't matter. It should raise the caution for pausing even more then!There are no rounds in injustice.
Nope, looks like he was fine: http://www.finalround.org/rules.cfmPerfect legend was USING A WIRELESS 360 CONTROLLER (interesting Bc on his twitter he claimed he could of had king d/q'ed for using a wireless controller). Carls controller was on player 1 and the corresponding light on his controller was lit up and using nrs tester.
This is not a good way to do things, because you can't police this on every station. And you run into other problems.A simple rule could be if you have the lead and hit the pause button then the match is restarted, so you lose the advantage but not the round/game; if you don't have the lead and hit the pause button the you lose that round; now because IGAU has no rounds then the match is restarted, the oponent takes your first life bar, then wait to the timer to be set at the same time when the pause happened, and start the fight.
Edit: I forgot meter, if you have the lead then the match is restarted but the other player has the right to build 50% from start...well, thinking about it, we should consider how great is the lead advantage before the pause and other things, but I think it is worth; it punished the player that pause while taking in consideration the circunstances during the fight, instead of a blind rule.
There should be a dislike button on TYM precisely for comments like this.You know I think King had something to do with it. It was a bit too obvious as PL quit and King was handed off a wad of cash after the fact. With King's shit-eating grin it looked as though there may have been some sort of "underhandedness" going down that may have caused the game to pause. I'm sorry but faces never lie!