TheSpore
Nurgle Chaos God of Death and Disease
Actually it can be considered a baby when it is able to survive outside the mother's womb which can be anywhere after 10 weeks since conception.
Actually it can be considered a baby when it is able to survive outside the mother's womb which can be anywhere after 10 weeks since conception.
You take some time to better understand what it is honestly (no offense BTW), yes it is affecting some people in negative ways and fully agree its not yet ready to be implemented, but as with any new system it has to utilized and ironed out over time, kinda like how IGAU was when its release, it had issue that had to be patched multiple times to make it a better game, same goes with Obama Care, the only way to fix the issues is to place it in effect.
The federal government isn't supposed to have anything to offer the people besides it's constitutional rights. That was what the founding fathers intended in order to leave no incentive for corruption. More incentive = more corruption which could lead to things like tyranny down the road.
Usually yes after 9 months, but the 10 week factor has to be acknowledged if one is to fully decide if and when this child is considered a human life.
If you give me a lil time I may be able to help you on this project, I obtained a BA degree in Criminal Justice and I may be able to provide some good information on that topic. I just can't make a good response ATM
I mean a psychological research project. I'm doing a literature review for my lab on it, I just saw the judge thing mentioned so I looked up a few things about it haha.
Id say you're a brain washed sheep d-bag...calm your roll brah
I agree with the first part of your post. I don't think people should be trying to support a family on min wage though. Raising min wage wouldn't do anything but make getting a min wage job harder.
Who's "they"?
The politicians. The ones in the house, senate and white house.
You do realize that conservatives and liberals run on entirely opposite platforms right? I mean there is some middle ground but saying they are the same is just straight up false.
Not calling you out but this is a common misconception. War is lucrative to industries involved in it, but as a whole it is not good for a nation unless it is a situation of total war. Wars on smaller scales like our current endeavors in Afghanistan and recent past in Iraq are more harmful to the economy. If I took you out of context, my bad.
I agree where your coming from and more or less it varies. Our current wars, imo, I believe to be the game changers. Wars that destroy our economy to the point of no return, all the while we suffer as our elites grow financially. Take the oil industry for example. Their profits are skyrocketing, and getting big business tax cuts, while us, the little guy, gets burned by the high gas prices. Although it deals with trade as well. We buy overseas oil at high cost, and sell even higher in our own country (USA) while we sell our reserved oil to countries like China for a very cheap price. Being in debt to them doesn't help either lol.
There is a lot of messed up things that go on in the criminal justice system.
My opinion on this issue is that the politcal spectrum of the right wing is too diverse currently. Others may say that it is because the right wing tricks certain people into voting against their own interests that end up benefiting the elite over themselves; this might be true to some extent but I think it is because they have so many core issues in common, that they are simply roped into voting for the other interests of their party that they may simply not agree with.
While it's never good to be in dept to anyone, a lot of the controversy surrounding this issue is somewhat lost to me. The economy of the world market is quite dependent upon the consumer economy of the United States, including China's own economy. So this really isn't an issue in my eyes until China's standard of living raises much higher.
The biggest issue with the prison system is that the majority of it is privitized. So long as people benefit off of the incarceration of individuals, atrocities like the Kids for Cash scandal that you mentioned will always exist. Roughly 70% of the prison population are offenders serving time on non-violent crimes without a history of violence, the majority of which are drug offenders. This is also another reason why the war on drugs is raged as hard as it is. Then within the war on drugs there is more prejudice placed upon the urban culture. Drugs such as cocaine and crack that are vary similar chemically have different sentencings. Cocaine, which is considered to be used more by wealtier people, has a less severe punishment than crack, which is considered to be used more by poor people. The profit motive in the prison system can also be observed by the fact that the US has the highest prison population to total population ratio. Then take into account the revolving door in the prison industry; two out of every three people released from prison usually end up back in prison within a relatively short period I believe. The point of prison is for it to be a correctional facility yet there are next to no programs for prisoners to better themselves by learning job skills, therapy, or other beneficial programs, and those that due exist are very small, and under funded. So the reason they end up back in prison is a mix between the failure of the prison system to reassimilate inmates back into society and the general vilification of past offenders in our society. The problem though is the system benefits if past offenders go back to jail, so why would the system want to fix the revolving door? This is all my opinion by the way, lol.
Haha, not sure which part of that I was meant to see. All the stuff about him being Kenyan/Muslim is propaganda and I'm not well read on the Israel conflict but I do believe that we are on the wrong side of the issue as a nation. The displacement of the Jewish people in Israel after WWII was not a good solution for that region and serves more as a foothold for Western Idealism in the region, which is why I feel the Palestinians are the victims. I didn't hear too much about the one state solution when Obama was pushing it a year or so ago but I think it was a step in the right direction. If I remember correctly the one state solution was favored by the majority of the public in Israel despite the government being against it. Israel doesn't want to lose power, and the Palestinians don't want to share power.
