Menu
By:
Filters
What's new

Yomi just released a new video... but still using ForeverKing!

Jynks

Jynks

some heroes are born, some made, some wondrous
So BurgerKing has yet to properly switch to his new naem... Yomi's latest video posted AFTER the match is still using his old nick! I say that this a breach of condition : )



I get the cup is form before the event.. but still this should read BURGERKING!
 
Airvidal

Airvidal

"You play weird" It's called being unorthodox ;)
Under the law of fair use of copyright of nick names, the accused "Burger King" is not breaching any part of the condition stipulated on the "Forever King vs Cowboy" 2015 court case.

The agreement is that the accused is to use the new nickname for the rest of the year, where past events are excluded. This tournament was won by Forever King and should remain as is. Case closed.
 
Pshak

Pshak

Noob
Airvidal said:
Under the law of fair use of copyright of nick names, the accused "Burger King" is not breaching any part of the condition stipulated on the "Forever King vs Cowboy" 2015 court case.

The agreement is that the accused is to use the new nickname for the rest of the year, where past events are excluded. This tournament was won by Forever King and should remain as is. Case closed.
Click to expand...
Guess you cant argue with this.
 
Daemantalo

Daemantalo

Not Good Enough
Airvidal said:
Under the law of fair use of copyright of nick names, the accused "Burger King" is not breaching any part of the condition stipulated on the "Forever King vs Cowboy" 2015 court case.

The agreement is that the accused is to use the new nickname for the rest of the year, where past events are excluded. This tournament was won by Forever King and should remain as is. Case closed.
Click to expand...
Yay formal statements and logic!
 
Bovine McKow

Bovine McKow

Noob
Airvidal said:
Under the law of fair use of copyright of nick names, the accused "Burger King" is not breaching any part of the condition stipulated on the "Forever King vs Cowboy" 2015 court case.

The agreement is that the accused is to use the new nickname for the rest of the year, where past events are excluded. This tournament was won by Forever King and should remain as is. Case closed.
Click to expand...
SUSTAINED!
 
Jedimindtricks

Jedimindtricks

Noob
Airvidal said:
Under the law of fair use of copyright of nick names, the accused "Burger King" is not breaching any part of the condition stipulated on the "Forever King vs Cowboy" 2015 court case.

The agreement is that the accused is to use the new nickname for the rest of the year, where past events are excluded. This tournament was won by Forever King and should remain as is. Case closed.
Click to expand...
Wasn't it just to use the new name in tournaments only? Otherwise someone needs to switch up their Twitter handle.
 
TackyHaddock

TackyHaddock

Salty Mashers Krew
Airvidal said:
Under the law of fair use of copyright of nick names, the accused "Burger King" is not breaching any part of the condition stipulated on the "Forever King vs Cowboy" 2015 court case.

The agreement is that the accused is to use the new nickname for the rest of the year, where past events are excluded. This tournament was won by Forever King and should remain as is. Case closed.
Click to expand...
I smell a law student!
 
GamerBlake90

GamerBlake90

Blue Blurs for Life!
SMH.

Typical TYM.

Airvidal said:
Under the law of fair use of copyright of nick names, the accused "Burger King" is not breaching any part of the condition stipulated on the "Forever King vs Cowboy" 2015 court case.

The agreement is that the accused is to use the new nickname for the rest of the year, where past events are excluded. This tournament was won by Forever King and should remain as is. Case closed.
Click to expand...
Aaaaaand, that sums it up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.