TakeAChance
TYM White Knight
But it doesn't give her anything. I would be more willing to bet it's +1. The jump test shows virtually no difference in landing frames.it's not neutral it's either +1 or +2.
But it doesn't give her anything. I would be more willing to bet it's +1. The jump test shows virtually no difference in landing frames.it's not neutral it's either +1 or +2.
Not at all. I already knew it was neutral or close to neutral on hit.So...
Um...
oops?
For what?it's not neutral. so she does get something. use the frame or two.
So you want me to do low sai for +1 (punishable on block) (somewhat hitconfirmable, but fuzzyable)condition them not to hit a button after low sai with roll.
You do Low sai like bit saidSo you want me to do low sai for +1 (punishable on block) (somewhat hitconfirmable, but fuzzyable)
Then follow it up with a 7f roll (mid, punishable on block) (not at all hitconfirmable)
I don't want to get into theory craft about matchups since they all vary,
But when is that ever a good risk/reward? Not to mention nothing about that "setup" is iron clad at all. To many variable to cover and way to many ways to get my shit pushed in. Roll does not account for jumping, armor, 6-7f pokes/strings, NJP, and the plethora of other options characters have to beat the roll, and the F4, The ex roll etc. The opposing character is not restricted in any to abuse their often better offensive and defensive options.
That's like saying the Muffin Muggers Mixup was awesome.
I understand the concept, but in no way does a person ever have to respect the roll. I'm gambling half my life for another HARD read. Sure I can telekick a jump or bait their armor or even roll myself to a combo/death. But was the inital setup worth that sort of risk/reward?You do Low sai like bit said
They get hit or whatever, then you shoot out a roll.
Next time the sai hits them, they should be expecting a roll. I mean come on, you just gave them a free punish right.
So after the sai, they are sitting there waiting for a roll. They want that punish baaaad.
Use the time they are sitting there in anticipation for the roll, to do something else.
I.E Learn to condition. Learn to know what you are doing that conditions each player
We get it; you want her to be a low risk, high reward zoner. I don't agree with that idea at all and think low sai is just fine the way it is. Why not just play Erron Black instead?I understand the concept, but in no way does a person ever have to respect the roll. I'm gambling half my life for another HARD read. Sure I can telekick a jump or bait their armor or even roll myself to a combo/death. But was the inital setup worth that sort of risk/reward?
The reason why I want the low sai + on block is so that it opens up her options AFTER making such a read and gamble.
So you want me to do low sai for +1 (punishable on block) (somewhat hitconfirmable, but fuzzyable)
Then follow it up with a 7f roll (mid, punishable on block) (not at all hitconfirmable)
You do Low sai like bit said
They get hit or whatever, then you shoot out a roll.
Next time the sai hits them, they should be expecting a roll. I mean come on, you just gave them a free punish right.
So after the sai, they are sitting there waiting for a roll. They want that punish baaaad.
Use the time they are sitting there in anticipation for the roll, to do something else.
I.E Learn to condition. Learn to know what you are doing that conditions each player
Low sai is not kabals IAGB. If you get hit by low sai from full screen (hit) you deserve to get another sai tossed at you lol. Are you saying you couldn't block a low sai from full screen, or jump a low sai from full screen? How does that make her a super strong zoner? Even at midscreen if we account for travel frames and advantage she would at most net a jump in...AT MOST. How is that broken in this game?We get it; you want her to be a low risk, high reward zoner. I don't agree with that idea at all and think low sai is just fine the way it is. Why not just play Erron Black instead?
The question is what does mileena actually get for conditioning an opponent to block.
LMAO I legit just laughed reading that haha.yeah do it. fuck it.
or you can do EX roll to cover a lot of that. IDK whatever.
With a +1 advantage? GTFOa 50/50 between f+4 and EX roll.
With a +1 advantage? GTFO
You could always "take a chance"LMAO I legit just laughed reading that haha.
EX Roll, Roll, B12, blah blah blah all get beat clean by a jump forward/NJ. The opponent doesn't have to respect shit and you know it.
I am not gambling half my health for an essentially 1f advantage in the neutral for Mileena. You know better than to suggest that bullshit lol
The roll is not a proper tool to condition with there at +1.he said after they're conditioned to block so you GTFO.