All you have to worry about is doing whats right. If you see something, say something. You don't need a movement for that. It's called being a good human being.
I don't know how realistic my idea is but if there isn't one already, there needs to be a sort of network where if a person is reported as having been kicked out of a convention for doing something bad word should be passed to other convention via some event network to blacklist them. If such a system is in place then it seems to have failed.
It aint hard to change your appearance and get a new name. Some musicians do it to when their career fails and they want to start over.
Maybe because the person ran it was afraid of the backlash. I still need to talk more to that person but all I know is people been known about Gllty's behavior. Its just never been public until now.
Dont like that you included just men because people seem to have this idea that women arent capable of sexually harassing men or other women but that was probably just an oversight. Not everyone gets to be as lucky as Vic and still have a chance at a good life. My issue is that even if that chance is rare its still not a chance I am willing to take.
That 328 includes men and women, I'm sure. Consider it an oversight.
Not a lot of people would admit this, but yes, women aren't delicate flowers XDyep, and fuck them that good, when they agree with , and is a consensual agreement from both parts, hehe ....
My friend was falsely accused and now he's a registered sex offender and can't leave the country all because his ex was pissed at him.
That sucks for him. He was convicted in a court of law though, was he not? I'm not as familiar with the Canadian legal system, but it's not like he was simply accused and added to the registry without getting his due day in court. Hopefully he can get things cleared up. Like I said, it certainly does happen. Doesn't change the facts. Doesn't mean it's still not a rare occurrence.
Yeah, that's true, he was found guilty but based on what evidence? They were both drunk so hey I don't know. Maybe he did it, I honestly don't wanna know. But it's still hard to make a ruling when you weren't there especially if both parties were drunk.
Well, for one, he hasn't been PROVEN to have done anything yet. That's how we work in the civilized world; Innocent until proven guilty.
That's fine, since he hasn't faced any legal repercussions yet. Innocent until proven guilty is a legal standard. It applies in the court of law.
Unfortunately in the court of public opinion its the opposite. Thats the downside to things like this when somebody is outed. So just like somebody said, I encourage everybody to get both sides of the story. But alot of these muthafuckas are coming out with confessions like WTF!?
There is no “beyond a reasonable doubt “ stipulation within the court of society. We can and should call out those who have but be careful not to ruin someone’s life on a hunch.
That's the special skill of shitty people they will take anything, no matter how good the original intentions were, and twist it to their own advantage thus ruining it for others.
Absolutely. Getting both sides is great. At the same time, if there is a credible person, or credible people, making an accusation, then I think it's worth listening to them and giving them the benefit of the doubt.
Yeah pretty much, it's messed up. Like some people can't tell the difference between ione thing to get back at someone but another to ruin their entire life.
Under title 9 in the US you can’t even consent to sex if you’re drunk. It’s the reason why I don’t attend any parties despite being in college.
That is a smart idea. Even if it is considered as a part of the college culture, if there's a risk involved, sometimes its best to not take part.
