That's good. I prefer the Street Fighter and Marvel fight enders where it ends in a dramatic flash with the killing blow. It's a lot more exciting to watch over fatalities, teabagging, etc. Especially after you've seen the same animations 100 times. I hope Injustice adopts something like this.

Heroic teabags.

"This game is a little bit more serious."

riiiight

I thought I would be bummed NOT seeing Fatalities, but given the restrictions that these characters will have that were evident for MK vs Dc, I would prefer not to see half arsed Fatalities and wait for the real ones in the next MK.

I think its a good idea to keep Fatalities for MK regardless, its something to look forward to.

Injustice should have its own thing going on, whatever that may be.

MK9 fatalities were ass anyways.

Even though i feel this is good, TargetAudience pretty much sums up what I really thought about this.

Something dramatic could happen when the final attack hits, but it should be short in duration and happen automatically. Not something someone chooses to input after the match itself is over.

Like someone said, sf4, mvc3 finisher style should be fine... you get an xray or super move that kills your opponent and you get dramatic ending and stuff.

Some babality-like stuff would be nice.

There you have it guys. Lobo is confirmed!

So Ed is a spam advocate....spamming in games without trades is braindead. Just because everyone can do it, casuals and pros, doesn't mean that it should be as strong as Ed seems to like it. He didn't say zoning. He said spam. So can we stop calling it zoning because it's not zoning if your opponent has to lose life while trying to close the distance. Spam is almost exclusively a one sided projectile onslaught. Zoning is a battle for the control of limited space. Characters like SF4/AE Sagat can really go balls out with projectiles, but they can be matched for the most part, and he has shitty mobility. Whatever. I can't wait to see what braindead shit people come up with.

Did he just confirm Blue Beetle?

Art thou vexed, brother?

Most MK9 players seem to have no idea of what a balanced fighter should be like.

Divekickou.
But I'd rather play MK9 than Divekick.

Man, you are being a really Negative Nancy...but I agree with you.

A certain person said that if a fighter doesnt have every char 5-5 to each other the whole cast then is not balanced.... sigh.

Tell that to T-Hawk haha.

Scrubs would never understand this concept.

I know you're joking, but most of T. Hawk's matchups are WAY worse than 5-5. And even still, if only one character out of like 40 is that gimpy and he's a grappler of all things, the game is pretty well balanced. Say what you will about SF4, most characters can "cheap" their way out of a 6-4 / 7-3 situation with enough patience and dedication... except T. Hawk.

And even if all or most match ups in a game are 5/5 the game can still wind up with a glitch or retarded hitbox that creates sharp tiers, like the CvS and (early) Calibur games. Fortunately, people will still support it if its actually fun to play.