Spider-man 3 is universally regarded as the worst of that trilogy. I don't think it's terrible, but they tried to do way too much in one film. I thought Venom was absolutely terrible in that movie. I also think Toby was a perfect Peter/Spidey. Everyone has their own opinions, though.
Universally agreed means shit to me, I don't read reviews until I've formed my own opinions. The amount of trash I see getting good reviews in pop culture is enough to tell me not to let other people decide what I like. Sequels nearly always get marked harsher, third entries even more so. That being said, I don't necessarily think Spiderman 3 is better than the other two, I just don't think it's spectacularly bad in any ways that the other two are not.
Spiderman 3 was just sooo bad . Venon was bad.. Spidey was worse .. way to emo.. way to much crying....stale acting..
The excessive crying was more of a thing in the previous two movies.
You think the villains in Ghostbusters are "ghosts"?
My god that list is ass.
Can't blame my selection for being ass...
300 and sharknado dafuq
I know that the villains of Ghostbusters aren't quite so cut and dry as "ghosts". It's mainly Gozer, but there's others.
There's a couple weird picks but most of it's pretty good tbh
I'd say Zyphox, considering Dragon is like 13 or something like that.
