I'm in the same boat man. I barely have time in the day to play and there's still so much shit I haven't done yet.As long as there's no on disc content that they'll want me to pay to unlock, I'm fine with it. As it is, I don't have the time to even explore what's on the disc currently.
If they plan on rolling out additional content that's already on disc over time, I'm cool with that.
This is the pattern on how these threads go.Where the hell is this coming from? Calm your shit.
Yeah I have to side with you on this one.Is this the part where we act like this isn't an industry standard now?
WHAT?I bet Bungie let this glitch slide because they feel bad about what Activision makes them do. Things was kind of the same during the Halo days
A gaming market crash won't stop the mobile games from being great.This is the pattern on how these threads go.
On disc dlc content is found.
People freak out and scream cash grab and vow boycott.
Some folks don't care and the first group freaks out and accuses these sheeple of continuing the viscious cycle of on disc dlc.
In the end, nothing changes. No ones opinions are changed. The people who weren't going to buy the dlc still aren't, and the people that were going to buy the dlc still are.
This is the future of gaming. Always online, pay wall dlc on disc, content held back at launch.... It's idealistic to think anything other than a major market crash is gong to change it.
It's not really that prominent outside of Activision/EA/Ubisoft.Is this the part where we act like this isn't an industry standard now?
Destiny was in development for something like 5 years.I don't understand this whole concept of "if it's on the disk I paid for, why do I have to pay again to get all of the content?" OK I worded that badly but you get the idea. On disk dlc is a delivery method and nothing more. It's the same as buying MK9 and bitching because Qcan Chi and Cyber Sub were locked (and people did).
On disk dlc is no different than "true dlc" except that it will most likely run smoother with less glitches due to the CPU not having to look in multiple places at once to stream the game information.
At the end of the day, if the content was earmarked to be dlc, on disk or not, we are not entitled to have it until the company allows us to access it. If you want to play CEO and complain that this encourages companies to release incomplete games, you're partly right. The problem isn't on disk dlc though. It's dlc period mixed with horrendous r$d times/expenditures. Companies need to release sooner than maybe we would like with less content than we might want simply because they need monies to "finish the game".
What is everyone's feelings on this? I personally cannot stand when companies do this and it makes me never want to buy their DLC.
What content was locked on MK9?People here were OK with them locking content on disc for MK9 and now Goro from MKX. So most will be fine with this as well. The general consumer is a moron.
People were probably hopeful that the full game would be completely different than the beta.The thing I find funny is alot of you found their demo good enough to make this game a must have, lol it was fun to an extent but it was never gonna last long.
On-disc content that is unlocked via pre-order is a completely different (and somewhat less scandalous) practice. This is an entirely different animal.People here were OK with them locking content on disc for MK9 and now Goro from MKX. So most will be fine with this as well. The general consumer is a moron.
Surrendering to "industry standards" is how we got here in the first place. When Microsoft shat in their customers mouths over crooked used games and kinect, the customers fought back and they won. Turning a blind eye is only ensuring the next incarnation will be worse.Is this the part where we act like this isn't an industry standard now?