Maybe that's the problem?
Unless your staring at the screen waiting for a teleport, a poke is a reasonable punish. Not everybody has godlike reactions. However, Axel_Redd mayb you could use d3 to at least get a little more adv?
U don't need godlike reactions to punish raiden's tele. Atleast do smth like d1~cutter, if u can hit him w d1 on reaction.
d1 cutter can get blown up even on hit. If he respects it then why not. Standing 2 will punish it.... But it really isn't practical for most of the community. Some of us could do it, some of us could not.
Oh, cmon, it's 11 frames i punish raiden's tele easily w Kabal's f+4 and it's i9 iirc, even if u fail u get a blockstring, which is better than a poke.
This argument has been going on forever. Pig of the hut said he could punish tele every time with shoulder charge and guess what, perfect legend beat him with teleport. A good raiden will be so hard to predict with his teles that punishing most of them wont be possible. PLUS you have to worry about ex tele
i don't get what r u trying to say, even if u mess up ur 2 punish w kitana u can just do a blockstring, which does more damage than d3 recommended by u
and wtf is this
1/VB and D1 would like a word with you...just sayin...
Maybe he means neutral jump punch...
O OK.. I do njp sometimes. It usually only works in the raiden player tries to attack or jump after the teleport.
Tell me why.
Yeah. Having a huge hitbox hurts.
