Just because of stubborn mentality and the same reason why a lot of issues in the world existWhy isn't smash an actual fighting game? Or rather, why is it a party game not worthy of being at evo? I thought we were over this "Smash is a party game" thing back in like 2012. It is ridiculous now. In fact I would very confidently say that Melee is a better fighting game than MKX.
What does competivity mean? This word seems made up. Also, which game is "near-perfect"? MKX is far far far from perfect.Goes to show, you can make a near-perfect game, but take the competivity away and this is the result: less competitors, less exposure, less credibility. It doesn't affect me (living in EU) but I'm sure the players, the viewers and NRS are unhappy with this, I think MKX deserves better - although, maybe not right now - but this is justifiable cause and reaction (sorry to say).
It has 2637 entrants, its much of a fighting game as MKX.Gotta make sure that fucking party game Smash gets a prime spot! And don't go telling me how many entrants it has. I don't give a fuck. It's a party game and has no business at EVO. Ugh, this is awful. I feel terrible for the guys who will be competing in top 8. They'll barely be able to celebrate the night before.
Get rid of everything Smash related and let that have it's own tourney. That would free up four hours for actual fighting games.
Apparently it is made up, correct term is competitiveness, you knew what I meant, though, right?What does competivity mean? This word seems made up. Also, which game is "near-perfect"? MKX is far far far from perfect.
bruhaside from frame data and hitbox issues (mechanics),
Overwatch would get a shit ton of entrants if they held it at EVO, as well. The number of entrants doesn't justify it being at EVO alongside true fighters.It has 2637 entrants, its much of a fighting game as MKX.
By your logical, if Smash is a party game then MKX would be a casuals game meaning it should haven no place in evo since its not an actual fighting game, its just a casual game right?