That's interesting, thanks. I didn't get a beta code so I'm just going by what ive heard, on Injustice 2 having a heavier emphasis on neutral, more defensive options, less stupid mixups, etc.
Antiairs and walkspeed, neutral feels clunky, playing footsies feels like making a risky commitment more than safe reactionary playstyle. Zoning is still a chore and and using projectiles is almost brainless but that could change over time once the meta is developed. Unblockable interactables are still a thing. The input system is still really bad. The frame data or blockstun is weird where a string will be -10 and you can't punish it with like an 8 frame move just like inj 1. Or situations where you're plus 5 and feel like -2 lul.
Honestly if you like sfv it's kinda hard for you to drop it, no matter how flawed it is. Remember every other fighting game will have flaws too, the difference is that the life of sfv is long and those flaws seem a bit less worrying as you will most likely see most of them fixed in its life. I'm excited for injustice2, but it's s different game, I'll probably end up playing both the same, alongside mk, IF I like inj2 like I liked mkx. I don't think too many SF fans would drop the game for an nrs game honestly, because they're so different to begin with.
I know what you mean about the lack of mid range game in Injustice 1 - I was hoping the better walk speed would fix that.
Yeah my issue is that I work 50+ hours a week and travel every three weekends or so, so I only have time to play one game really. I'll try Injustice 2 out and if I like it more I will probably switch. But if SFV is more fun I'll stick to that.
Yea I get you, I don't have too much time to play myself so I understand. And it gets worse for us come September when mvci drops lol, at least we have choices.
Yeah you must be new here. I play busted characters and specifically point out shit thats broken as why I like to play them, I'm just saying that ex slide is in no way too strong it might even be his worst metered option, it's not even an option he uses outside of some weird meaty situations and side switch mixups. Akuma has like no dirt.
Not how opinions work. Me not liking Akuma being +2 after ex demon slide for whatever reason I have is perfectly fine as an opinion. You being extra defensive is unnecessary though. I didn't make a tierlist. I didn't suggest any changes. Just said "man I find this annoying". I find Cammy v-trigger dive annoying, Nash's LK sonic scythe annoying. They'r really effective moves and they're annoying when used correctly. Simple as that.
Well you did say that it shouldn't be plus(I'm assuming that's your point here)but that's irrelevant at this point, and you can have whatever opinions/beliefs you want but if you can't back them up with a reason I don't have to respect them, that's some childish stuff lol. I mean what would you do about it?
I'm perfectly fine with your reasoning for why it's plus, even though it wasn't a serious question. I didn't shut anything down, I simply told you my point is that I don't like it. You're arguing shit I never opposed. You started an argument after being told I'm not trying to argue about the moves properties.
Yea hopefully I can learn inj2 to where I get past the beginner experience. My execution is bad most of the time but I'll manage. I know that with practice I'll learn all that clash stuff. Gear I wasn't a fan of ever since I heard of it and even though I never played injustice I kinda thought it would be cheapish. Now I love mkx and I beliebe Ive asked this before but is Injustice kinda like mkx in a way?
To be completely honest idgaf if you like what my character has. My problem is that you DONT have a reason to dislike it. It's like when I'm with my 5 year old niece and she's arguing about why she doesn't like the song little wing, "because i don't like it" isn't a stance rational adults take. I'd accept a shitty reason, just have a reason.
nobody gives a shit what you accept and what you dont, he doesnt like the move and its going to stay that way no matter how hard it is for you to deal with that reality, its been 3 page of this shit now move on
Yes and your input is super important and will surely help move this conversation in a good direction. Thanks.
A lot of these criticisms about Injustice 2 are things that are very much a part of SFV.
You're still on this argue thing. We discussed it. I asked questions. I'm still going to dislike it. Were you trying to convince me to like it? I honestly don't know how to make this any clearer. If we were actually arguing the balance of the move then whatever. But I'm not, I'm simply stating my dislike of a move. I'm done. A person can simply not like something.
I'm willing to drop it since it seems to be what you wanna do but honestly I just wanted to know why you dislike the move, I don't think a person can just not like something there's gotta be a reason.
Walkspeed is better but it's that's a low bar from Injustice 1. Your playing footsies with advancing strings so even though you just outspaced Supergirl's B1 advancing mid by the the time you react with with your button the quick low followup in Supergirl's b12 string is clipping you for trying to whiff punish or walk back.
You can actually antiair in sfv, you do actually have walkspeed in sfv, there is no zoning in sfv, there is no autofootsie trait calls in sfv, there are no advancing Mid strings in sfv...so what are you talking about lul
Did you mistype that or do you actually think sfv has "no zoning". It's definitely weaker than it was but I don't think you can say zoning as a concept doesn't exist. They did go a little overboard with the anti fireball tech though.