Then everybody would be a fighting game master, but not everyone is.
There's plenty of repetition going on around here, but true mastery requires something else. At the end of the day you are still fighting your opponents, not the game.
Then everybody would be a fighting game master, but not everyone is.
He actually made it out of his pool in winners, where he then lost to Kazunoko.Facts don't care about your feelings.
by master I was reffering to becoming good at something. As in all simple tasks effort is the key to becoming good. You could say someone has a talent for, say, mopping the floor, but in fact there is little talent involved. But of course if you run "mop the floor" competition some people will always be better. Even a mopping prodigy may rise. Still the less complicated task is, the less talent impacts it.
Yeah, I guess I wouldn't equate being good to knowing the moves and combos. Just like I wouldn't say you were 'good' at chess just because you knew how to move the pieces.
If you break it down its actually a matter of memory and reaction. You need to be able to recognize something (move, pattern, situation) and then make a link to your memory pool that processes the decision (this player loves WKA/This move is not safe/This combo will be dropped b/c of bounce height etc etc), the more links you create the better you will become. Creating this links is way more of a patience thing than actual research (a reason why theory fighters almost never accomplish anything). For the brain it is a routine procedure of programming. Which sort of just lead me to an idea that younger age could actually be an advantage for playing FGs, lol.
I think it has more to do with him being a piece of shit. That's what he does, he goes to threads and just talks shit. He got called out on doing the same thing on some Smash boards. Thank you for finding the time to respond calmly and logically, but I fear he's just a tool. I mean troll. But mostly tool.
Go back, watch my matches, and tell me dropping combos doesnt kill you in this game.
Why is 80% of people on tym so thin skinned? Ofcourse dropping combos gets you killed. Do you think that I think dropping combos wins you games some how? Sonic Fox doesn't make that excuse though. He just goes and wins. That's obviously a personal problem you hve that you need to fix. Something you need to practice.
Maybe it's because you're going about it the wrong way? No one should be talking shit about anything.
Seriously, if you want to hurt someone let them talk. This guy was hurting himself and making himself look extremely bad and losing what little credibility he had. Yes, this guy is an asshole. Don't keep people from knowing that by censoring him. When you do that you start to make yourself look like the bad guys instead.
Look like the bad guy in whose eyes? His? Big deal. Why would we look like the "bad guys" to anyone else other than him? There's nothing wrong with making sure other people don't have to read the nonsense that he posts the majority of the time, especially if it will prevent further arguing and/or off-topic posts.
Why would you look like the bad guys? Who knows now, most people in this thread can't even begin to understand the conversation because you censored him. I don't know why you're putting the word "censoring" in quotation marks when what you did falls under that definition perfectly. Whatever made that guy an asshole is now deleted and no one is going to understand the context now. The real problem was people responding to him and contributing to a pointless and hateful conversation. If they would of just ignored him, it wouldn't of even happened.
I'm censoring him because his posts aren't following the rules of these forums in some of his posts? Okay.
Well as someone who unintentionally offends people, I'm sympathetic to people who get censored. It's a matter of principle to me. I don't believe censorship is right. I mean this thread wouldn't be possible on a lot of other websites. The moment someone was offended, especially if it was a moderator, this thread would of been deleted even though I'm not saying anything that offensive. In my mind I'm trying to start a constructive conversation and the things I'm saying, to me, are simply common sense. A lot of people in here don't see it that way and think I'm attacking players under sonic fox but I'm not doing that at all.
Did you miss the parts where he would constantly bash the ENTIRE NRS community? Constantly bashing our game(s)? Raving on and on about how Capcom is so much better (not breaking any rules and it's his opinion, but he handled it the wrong way) and all that? Trying to insult an entire community and getting moderated for it isn't censoring an effin' thing.
Look at the likes Foxy's response to me has. He is obviously offended by what I said and people agree that he should be offended. They think I'm attacking him. Let me tell you what I think of a foxy grampa. Some of you may not know but he discovered all of the tech for cage in mk9, my main character. He discovered a lot of tech for rain. He discovered almost all of the tech for sonya. And he created Bird Lao which most people STILL think is just a legend. Only us who played him are true believers in that amazing animal. I played forever king quite a bit in mk9 and he mained lao. He got 3rd at the last real big evo for mk9 in 2012. Well I played both their laos and foxy's was just on another level. I truly believe if foxy didn't bust his head open and didnt counter pick himself against cd jr, and went full lao, he could of really won evo 2012. So I think he is World Champion material and have praised how good he is numerous times and even praised him IN THIS THREAD.
But you see, you and others have been discussing this without taking it to the level he did. That's seriously all it is.
The problem is people are giving me knee jerk reactions. They are also not thinking about what they are implying in what they say. There isn't a nice way to say "you're not working hard enough.". But this is a very plausible reason why sonic fox keeps winning. But when people say he just has "natural talent", what are they really saying? They are saying he is smarter than the competition, which implies the competition simply isn't smart enough to win. Saying a top player needs to practice more is a lot less offensive to me than saying "well he should give up because he just isn't smart enough." . What I'm saying isn't that controversial. If I were a top competitor in this game, let's say i'm tekken master in grand finals against sonic fox and I lose, my response to that is definitely going to be "I'm going to go home, study every detail of these matches, train hard, and come back and win." . That's the right response to have. And what does that response imply? It implies that you have work to do. You have to work at it, work harder. This what I've been saying and I don't see it as controversial.
They haven't said how they would do it. Point is, Floyd is intrigued. The numbers the two fighters can create makes it intriguing and its a win-win situation for everyone. So, both fighters popped off a little. Its what they both do. They're showmen. They're champions. Sonic Fox competes on a different venue, but the mindset is the same.He never said in an MMA style match now did he? Naaaah
Equal effort does not guarantee equal results. If someone achieves greater than average results with equal effort, what would you call that? I refer to it as being talented, however, you may prefer to say he has an aptitude for the skill. I mean, we're talking about the objectively observable rate of learning. That's what talent is, nothing more. It's meaningless without effort, but does have an impact.