What's new

People want your character NERFED. Why should s/he stay the way they are?

ArmedCalf

I guess I play Necromancer now.. PSN: ArmedCalf
Imposter is good where he's at rn I think. Truthfully at this point, I could care less if the sparks become like +7. But his string frame data is asssss so I wanna say keep the 7f low.
 
Reactions: QXD

TackyHaddock

Salty Mashers Krew
I don't want to nerf any character in the game to be honest.

Just want to buff everyone else to a viability level.
Wouldn't that just mean buffing kenshi and jason? I feel that everyone else in the game is already viable at the very least.

You wouldn't do anything to tanya's rekka pressure?
 

SaltShaker

In Zoning We Trust
Wouldn't that just mean buffing kenshi and jason? I feel that everyone else in the game is already viable at the very least.

You wouldn't do anything to tanya's rekka pressure?
I don't want Jacqui to become the new worst in the game lol. There's like 10 characters that need buffs imo. The game is more balanced than MK9 or Inj, but the balance is also overrated.

The gap between Lao/Tremor/etc and say, Mileena, is just too large imo.
 

Eddy Wang

Skarlet scientist
Wouldn't that just mean buffing kenshi and jason? I feel that everyone else in the game is already viable at the very least.

You wouldn't do anything to tanya's rekka pressure?
I don't want to nerf any character in the game to be honest.

Sometimes a character just needs a small adjustment, instead they're overnerfed, and become far worse than just about right.

Maybe a slight fix here and there, but definitely not a bulk of nerfs, there are still a lot of things in general gameplay that by fixing might actually reduce these characters tiers down a bit.
 

TackyHaddock

Salty Mashers Krew
I don't want Jacqui to become the new worst in the game lol. There's like 10 characters that need buffs imo. The game is more balanced than MK9 or Inj, but the balance is also overrated.

The gap between Lao/Tremor/etc and say, Mileena, is just too large imo.
I wasn't suggesting kenshi and jason are the only characters that need buffs, just that they are the only ones that need buffs to become viable, it is hard to see how any other character is not at least viable in this game. Not implying that there is perfect balance, just widespread viability
 

StealthyMuffin

Earth's Mightiest Knucklehead
"This should be nerfed because yadayada!"

"Nu-uh because *points to a better, similar tool that a completely different character has*. It wouldn't be fair if they got to keep theirs!"

It seems to be the go-to argument, so I'd go with that.
 

SaltShaker

In Zoning We Trust
I wasn't suggesting kenshi and jason are the only characters that need buffs, just that they are the only ones that need buffs to become viable, it is hard to see how any other character is not at least viable in this game. Not implying that there is perfect balance, just widespread viability
How do you define viability? Because I can't picture anyone entering KIT with Jacqui or Ermac or Mileena solo and placing Top 3 at this point of the game. Players are too knowledgable and characters at the top are too superior. So in a sense, while they can compete in some matches, your chances of winning through a bracket are extremely limited in comparison to other characters. That's why I think more characters need buffs.

In a perfect world every character should have the ability to win on their own, and if there are patches they should work towards making it happen the best way possible.
 

Rocket

For the Shirai Ryu.
My character or even characters should stay the same because one of them is ok but still pretty fucking bad and the other two are just straight up shit those characters are inferno scorpion, commando kano, balanced kenshi.